Thanks William and YiHung for review, I sent a new version.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:45 PM William Tu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:40 PM Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:06 PM Yifeng Sun
> wrote:
> > >
> > > ovs-vswitchd could crash under these circumstances:
> > >
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:40 PM Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:06 PM Yifeng Sun wrote:
> >
> > ovs-vswitchd could crash under these circumstances:
> > 1. When one bridge is being destroyed, ofproto_destroy() is called and
> > connmgr pointer of its ofproto struct is nullified.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:06 PM Yifeng Sun wrote:
>
> ovs-vswitchd could crash under these circumstances:
> 1. When one bridge is being destroyed, ofproto_destroy() is called and
> connmgr pointer of its ofproto struct is nullified. This ofproto struct is
> deallocated through
ovs-vswitchd could crash under these circumstances:
1. When one bridge is being destroyed, ofproto_destroy() is called and
connmgr pointer of its ofproto struct is nullified. This ofproto struct is
deallocated through 'ovsrcu_postpone(ofproto_destroy_defer__, p);'.
2. Before RCU enters quiesce
