it will trigger dry run. For this
rxq->overloading_pmd is required.
Regards,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:53 PM
To: Nitin Katiyar ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] RFC for support of PMD Auto l
Hi Nitin,
Thanks for your work on this and sharing the RFC. Initial comments below.
On 10/11/2018 08:59 PM, Nitin Katiyar wrote:
> Port rx queues that have not been statically assigned to PMDs are currently
> assigned based on periodically sampled load measurements.
> The assignment is performed
Hi,
Gentle reminder for review.
Regards,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Katiyar
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 10:49 AM
To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Cc: Rohith Basavaraja
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RFC for support of PMD Auto load balancing
Hi,
I forgot to mention that this patch does
Hi,
I forgot to mention that this patch does not handle frequent rx scheduling of
queues due to auto load balancing. That is something we had identified and
changes need to be done to dampen the frequent scheduling of rx queues across
PMDs.
Regards,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From:
Port rx queues that have not been statically assigned to PMDs are currently
assigned based on periodically sampled load measurements.
The assignment is performed at specific instances – port addition, port
deletion, upon reassignment request via CLI etc.
Over time it can cause uneven load among