On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:11:31AM +, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> On 7/11/17, 9:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> I'm very new to the concept of IPv6 link-local address scoping. What
> does this subset out of the larger feature?
>
>
On 7/11/17, 9:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
Thanks for the review.
I'm very new to the concept of IPv6 link-local address scoping. What
does this subset out of the larger feature?
There is lots of flexibility here, mostly not relevant to ovs; for example one
basic
Thanks for the review.
I'm very new to the concept of IPv6 link-local address scoping. What
does this subset out of the larger feature?
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:30:29PM +, Darrell Ball wrote:
> This looks correct to me and a reasonable subset of support of scoping,
> although I did not
This looks correct to me and a reasonable subset of support of scoping,
although I did not test it.
I noticed there was some unrelated cleanup w.r.t. parse_sockaddr_components(),
but those
changes are minor.
Acked-by: Darrell Ball
On 7/5/17, 5:20 PM,
I hadn't even heard of this feature before, but it seems to be at least
semi-standard to support Linux link-local address scopes via a % suffix,
e.g. fe80::1234%eth0 for a link-local address scoped to eth0. This commit
adds support.
I'd appreciate feedback from folks who understand this feature