On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 08:51:59AM +0800, Kaige Fu wrote:
> On 2017/11/2 4:19, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:43:20AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> >> On 10/30/2017 06:13 PM, fukaige wrote:
> >>> From: Kaige Fu
> >>>
> >>> IFF_NO_QUEUE is checked twice. This cause a situation
> >>> th
On 2017/11/2 4:19, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:43:20AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
>> On 10/30/2017 06:13 PM, fukaige wrote:
>>> From: Kaige Fu
>>>
>>> IFF_NO_QUEUE is checked twice. This cause a situation
>>> that HAVE_IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined no matter whether
>>> the flag IFF_NO_QU
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:43:20AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 06:13 PM, fukaige wrote:
> >From: Kaige Fu
> >
> >IFF_NO_QUEUE is checked twice. This cause a situation
> >that HAVE_IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined no matter whether
> >the flag IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined in kernel or not.
> >
> >Sig
On 10/30/2017 06:13 PM, fukaige wrote:
From: Kaige Fu
IFF_NO_QUEUE is checked twice. This cause a situation
that HAVE_IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined no matter whether
the flag IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined in kernel or not.
Signed-off-by: Kaige Fu
---
datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h | 3
From: Kaige Fu
IFF_NO_QUEUE is checked twice. This cause a situation
that HAVE_IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined no matter whether
the flag IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined in kernel or not.
Signed-off-by: Kaige Fu
---
datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff