On 26.08.2019 16:33, David Marchand wrote:
Add a coverage counter to help diagnose contention on the vhost txqs.
This is seen as dropped packets on the physical ports for rates that
are usually handled fine by OVS.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand
---
Thanks! I changed 'unlikely' to
On 26 Aug 2019, at 16:33, David Marchand wrote:
> Add a coverage counter to help diagnose contention on the vhost txqs.
> This is seen as dropped packets on the physical ports for rates that
> are usually handled fine by OVS.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand
LGTM, Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:36 PM David Marchand
wrote:
>
> Add a coverage counter to help diagnose contention on the vhost txqs.
> This is seen as dropped packets on the physical ports for rates that
> are usually handled fine by OVS.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand
Hey guys, can somebody look
Add a coverage counter to help diagnose contention on the vhost txqs.
This is seen as dropped packets on the physical ports for rates that
are usually handled fine by OVS.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
