Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] dpif-netdev: Conditional EMC insert

2017-01-30 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
2017-01-26 9:55 GMT-08:00 Loftus, Ciara : >> >> 2017-01-25 7:52 GMT-08:00 Loftus, Ciara : >> >> 2017-01-22 11:45 GMT-08:00 Jan Scheurich : >> >> > >> >> >> It's not a big deal, since the most important use case we have for >> >>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] dpif-netdev: Conditional EMC insert

2017-01-26 Thread Loftus, Ciara
> > 2017-01-25 7:52 GMT-08:00 Loftus, Ciara : > >> 2017-01-22 11:45 GMT-08:00 Jan Scheurich : > >> > > >> >> It's not a big deal, since the most important use case we have for > >> >> dpif-netdev is with dpdk, but I'd still like the code to behave >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] dpif-netdev: Conditional EMC insert

2017-01-23 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
2017-01-22 11:45 GMT-08:00 Jan Scheurich : > >> It's not a big deal, since the most important use case we have for >> dpif-netdev is with dpdk, but I'd still like the code to behave >> similarly on different platforms. How about defining a function that >> uses random_uint32

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] dpif-netdev: Conditional EMC insert

2017-01-22 Thread Jan Scheurich
It's not a big deal, since the most important use case we have for dpif-netdev is with dpdk, but I'd still like the code to behave similarly on different platforms. How about defining a function that uses random_uint32 when compiling without DPDK? For testing it's not that simple, because