>On 14/12/2016 06:38, "Balazs Nemeth" wrote:
>
>>>On 12/12/2016 13:14, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:50:32PM -0800, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> The order of the options in the packet generated by ovs-controller
> depends on the hash function. I believe that
On 14/12/2016 06:38, "Balazs Nemeth" wrote:
>>On 12/12/2016 13:14, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:50:32PM -0800, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
The order of the options in the packet generated by ovs-controller
depends on
>On 12/12/2016 13:14, "Ben Pfaff" > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:50:32PM -0800, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>>> The order of the options in the packet generated by ovs-controller
>>> depends on the hash function. I believe that murmur hash (our default)
On 12/12/2016 13:14, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:50:32PM -0800, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>> The order of the options in the packet generated by ovs-controller
>> depends on the hash function. I believe that murmur hash (our default)
>> produces different