On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 3:32 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 10/30/20 10:26 AM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > On 10/30/20 10:17 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:37 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Do not assume 'ofport' is unique for all OVS interfaces in the system.
> >>>
On 10/30/20 10:26 AM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> On 10/30/20 10:17 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:37 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>>
>>> Do not assume 'ofport' is unique for all OVS interfaces in the system. This
>>> is true only for interfaces within the same OVS bridge. Also,
On 10/30/20 10:17 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:37 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> Do not assume 'ofport' is unique for all OVS interfaces in the system. This
>> is true only for interfaces within the same OVS bridge. Also, only decode
>> br-int related interfaces.
>>
>>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:37 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Do not assume 'ofport' is unique for all OVS interfaces in the system. This
> is true only for interfaces within the same OVS bridge. Also, only decode
> br-int related interfaces.
>
> Also, fix printing of potential duplicate UUIDs
Do not assume 'ofport' is unique for all OVS interfaces in the system. This
is true only for interfaces within the same OVS bridge. Also, only decode
br-int related interfaces.
Also, fix printing of potential duplicate UUIDs decoded from cookies.
Reported-by: Michael Cambria
Reported-at: