On 26.06.2018 15:32, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 26 Jun 2018, at 12:02, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
>> On 26.06.2018 12:19, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 Jun 2018, at 21:03, Lam, Tiago wrote:
>>>
On 18/06/2018 12:28, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 11 Jun 2018, at 18:21,
On 26 Jun 2018, at 12:02, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 26.06.2018 12:19, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 22 Jun 2018, at 21:03, Lam, Tiago wrote:
On 18/06/2018 12:28, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 11 Jun 2018, at 18:21, Tiago Lam wrote:
A new mutex, 'nonpmd_mp_mutex', has been introduced to
On 26.06.2018 12:19, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Jun 2018, at 21:03, Lam, Tiago wrote:
>
>> On 18/06/2018 12:28, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 Jun 2018, at 18:21, Tiago Lam wrote:
>>>
A new mutex, 'nonpmd_mp_mutex', has been introduced to serialise
allocation and free
On 22 Jun 2018, at 21:03, Lam, Tiago wrote:
On 18/06/2018 12:28, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 11 Jun 2018, at 18:21, Tiago Lam wrote:
A new mutex, 'nonpmd_mp_mutex', has been introduced to serialise
allocation and free operations by non-pmd threads on a given
mempool.
Can you explain
On 18/06/2018 12:28, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 11 Jun 2018, at 18:21, Tiago Lam wrote:
>
>> A new mutex, 'nonpmd_mp_mutex', has been introduced to serialise
>> allocation and free operations by non-pmd threads on a given mempool.
>>
>
> Can you explain why we need the mutex here? Can't
On 11 Jun 2018, at 18:21, Tiago Lam wrote:
A new mutex, 'nonpmd_mp_mutex', has been introduced to serialise
allocation and free operations by non-pmd threads on a given mempool.
Can you explain why we need the mutex here? Can't see any reason why
rte_pktmbuf_free() needs to be protected
A new mutex, 'nonpmd_mp_mutex', has been introduced to serialise
allocation and free operations by non-pmd threads on a given mempool.
free_dpdk_buf() has been modified to make use of the introduced mutex.
Signed-off-by: Tiago Lam
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 21 -
1 file
