On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:13:14PM +, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >
> > The patch adds support for using need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings.
> > A new option, use_need_wakeup, is added. When this option is used,
> > it means that OVS has to explicitly wake up the kernel RX, using poll()
> > syscall
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:14:46PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 26.09.2019 21:29, William Tu wrote:
> >The patch adds support for using need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings.
> >A new option, use_need_wakeup, is added. When this option is used,
> >it means that OVS has to explicitly wake up the
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:13 AM Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>
> >
> > The patch adds support for using need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings.
> > A new option, use_need_wakeup, is added. When this option is used,
> > it means that OVS has to explicitly wake up the kernel RX, using poll()
> > syscall and wake
>
> The patch adds support for using need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings.
> A new option, use_need_wakeup, is added. When this option is used,
> it means that OVS has to explicitly wake up the kernel RX, using poll()
> syscall and wake up TX, using sendto() syscall. This feature improves
> the
On 26 Sep 2019, at 21:29, William Tu wrote:
The patch adds support for using need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings.
A new option, use_need_wakeup, is added. When this option is used,
it means that OVS has to explicitly wake up the kernel RX, using
poll()
syscall and wake up TX, using sendto()
The patch adds support for using need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings.
A new option, use_need_wakeup, is added. When this option is used,
it means that OVS has to explicitly wake up the kernel RX, using poll()
syscall and wake up TX, using sendto() syscall. This feature improves
the performance by
