Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the initialization step

m...@samsung.com>; Assaf > Muller <as...@redhat.com> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the > initialization step > > On 04/11/2018 02:21 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > "Mooney, Sean K" <sean.k.moo...@intel.com> writes: > >

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the initialization step

On 04/11/2018 02:21 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > "Mooney, Sean K" writes: > >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:acon...@redhat.com] >>> Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:32 PM >>> To: Mooney, Sean K >>> Cc:

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the initialization step

"Mooney, Sean K" writes: >> -Original Message- >> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:acon...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:32 PM >> To: Mooney, Sean K >> Cc: d...@openvswitch.org; Stokes, Ian ; Kevin >>

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the initialization step

> -Original Message- > From: Aaron Conole [mailto:acon...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:32 PM > To: Mooney, Sean K > Cc: d...@openvswitch.org; Stokes, Ian ; Kevin > Traynor ; Ilya Maximets

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the initialization step

"Mooney, Sean K" writes: > So just from a deployment tools point of view I would like to point out that > This change could break existing workflow that deploy ovs in a docker > container. > Kolla ansible assumes that if the docker ovs_vswitchd container is > still

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the initialization step

So just from a deployment tools point of view I would like to point out that This change could break existing workflow that deploy ovs in a docker container. Kolla ansible assumes that if the docker ovs_vswitchd container is still running that the is infact running in dpdk mode when we set

[ovs-dev] [RFC 0/2] dpdk: minor refactor of the initialization step

Sometimes, DPDK initialization can fail, but ovs-vswitchd will abort in that case. When that occurs, ovs-vswitchd will be restarted by the monitor and immediately abort. This is rather unfriendly to users, who would prefer to possibly correct the issue or at least, not have lots of processes