On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:04 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:56 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Numan. It looks good to me. Is there a reason why this is RFC?
>>
>
> Yes. I actually was thinking another way to disable conjunction.
>
> I will submit that patch and we
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:56 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> Thanks Numan. It looks good to me. Is there a reason why this is RFC?
>
Yes. I actually was thinking another way to disable conjunction.
I will submit that patch and we can discuss further.
Thanks
Numan
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 1:48 AM
Thanks Numan. It looks good to me. Is there a reason why this is RFC?
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 1:48 AM wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> The commit 298701dbc996("Exclude inport and outport symbol tables from
> conjunction")
> was earlier added to disable conjunction for inport and outport symbol
From: Numan Siddique
The commit 298701dbc996("Exclude inport and outport symbol tables from
conjunction")
was earlier added to disable conjunction for inport and outport symbols.
This patch extends it to all the symbos added in the symbol table by setting
the 'must_crossproduct' field to 'true'.
