<mailto:jan.scheur...@ericsson.com>>; Jay Ding <mailto:jay.d...@broadcom.com>>; Kevin Traynor <mailto:ktray...@redhat.com>>; Manasa Mudireddy
> mailto:manasa.mudire...@broadcom.com>>; Nitin
> Katiyar mailto:nitin.kati...@ericsson.com>>;
> Randy
Shahaji Bhosle
>> Cc: Jan Scheurich ; Jay Ding <
>> jay.d...@broadcom.com>; Kevin Traynor ; Manasa
>> Mudireddy ; Nitin Katiyar <
>> nitin.kati...@ericsson.com>; Randy Schacher > >; Stokes, Ian ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] 64Byte
M
> To: Shahaji Bhosle
> Cc: Jan Scheurich ; Jay Ding <
> jay.d...@broadcom.com>; Kevin Traynor ; Manasa
> Mudireddy ; Nitin Katiyar <
> nitin.kati...@ericsson.com>; Randy Schacher ;
> Stokes, Ian ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] 64Byte packet pe
...@samsung.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 10:25 PM
To: Shahaji Bhosle
Cc: Jan Scheurich ; Jay Ding
; Kevin Traynor ; Manasa Mudireddy
; Nitin Katiyar ;
Randy Schacher ; Stokes, Ian
; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] 64Byte packet performance regression on 2.9 from 2.7
Sure
lto:i.maxim...@samsung.com <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>>>
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com
/2.7 to OVS2.8.2(with DPDK17.05.02). The drop is more for 64 bytes
> packet size (~8-10%) even with higher number of flows. I tried OVS 2.8 with
> DPDK17.11 and it improved for higher packet sizes but 64 bytes size is
> still the concern.
> &
ng.com <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>>
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com <
> >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On
gt; >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > We also experienced degradation from OVS2.6/2.7 to
> OVS2.8.2(with DPDK17.05.02). The drop is more for 64 bytes packet size
> (~8-10%) even with higher number of flows. I tried OVS 2.8 wi
n.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nitin
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com
> <mailto:i
;
> > > Hi,
> > > We also experienced degradation from OVS2.6/2.7 to
> OVS2.8.2(with DPDK17.05.02). The drop is more for 64 bytes packet size
> (~8-10%) even with higher number of flows. I tried OVS 2.8 with DPDK17.11
> and it improv
gt; > From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>>]
> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 1:32 PM
> > To: ovs-dev@o
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > We also experienced degradation from OVS2.6/2.7 to OVS2.8.2(with
>> DPDK17.05.02). The drop is more for 64 bytes packet size (~8-10%) even with
>> higher number of flows. I tried OVS 2.8 with DPDK17.11 and it improved for
>> higher pa
> higher packet sizes but 64 bytes size is still the concern.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nitin
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com i.maxim...@samsung.com>]
> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 1:32 PM
8 with DPDK17.11 and it improved for
> higher packet sizes but 64 bytes size is still the concern.
>
> Regards,
> Nitin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>]
> S
-Original Message-
From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 1:32 PM
To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; shahaji.bho...@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] 64Byte packet performance regression on 2.9 from 2.7
CC: Shahaji Bhosle
Sorry, missed you in CC list
CC: Shahaji Bhosle
Sorry, missed you in CC list.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 15.06.2018 10:44, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I just upgraded from OvS 2.7 + DPDK 16.11 to OvS2.9 + DPDK 17.11 and
>> running into performance issue with 64 Byte packet rate. One interesting
>> thing that I
> Hi,
> I just upgraded from OvS 2.7 + DPDK 16.11 to OvS2.9 + DPDK 17.11 and
> running into performance issue with 64 Byte packet rate. One interesting
> thing that I notice that even at very light load from IXIA the processing
> cycles on all the PMD threads run close to 100% of the cpu cycle on
Hi,
I just upgraded from OvS 2.7 + DPDK 16.11 to OvS2.9 + DPDK 17.11 and
running into performance issue with 64 Byte packet rate. One interesting
thing that I notice that even at very light load from IXIA the processing
cycles on all the PMD threads run close to 100% of the cpu cycle on 2.9
OvS,
19 matches
Mail list logo