, 2018 1:06:34 AM
To: Gurucharan Shetty; Numan Siddique
Cc: Ankur Sharma; ovs dev
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] VLAN tenant network patches
Thanks for looking at this and keeping it moving forward.
I'm also fine with both ways of implementing the feature, and of course, having
distributed
E/W for VLAN
Thanks for looking at this and keeping it moving forward.
I'm also fine with both ways of implementing the feature, and of course,
having distributed
E/W for VLAN is great, It'd be amazing, based on not duplicating
interfaces, that the
implementations don't interfere each other, and that numan's
Okay. I want to make sure that we don't end up with 3 gateway
implementations. We currently have 2. So when you are adding this new
feature, please do NOT make it an independent feature which only works for
your use case. It will be a maintenance headache otherwise. Instead, it has
to be looked at
Hi Guru,
Sure, providing more explanation.
Q. What are we trying to solve?
Ans. Getting distributed routing to work for vlan backed networks through OVN.
Q. Disconnect wrt OVN capabilities for above task?
Ans. OVN lacks in certain areas wrt how to forward the packets
"correctly/efficiently"
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 21:02, Ankur Sharma wrote:
> Hi Guru,
>
> Thanks for spending time in understanding the proposal and drafting your
> understanding as well.
> Thanks Numan for pitching in.
>
> Some comments (trying to keep them as brief as possible).
>
> a. On a high level, we are trying
Hi Guru,
Thanks for spending time in understanding the proposal and drafting your
understanding as well.
Thanks Numan for pitching in.
Some comments (trying to keep them as brief as possible).
a. On a high level, we are trying to do following:
"Distributed router functionality for vlan
On 11/09/2018 04:16 PM, Guru Shetty wrote:
> Ankur's proposal:
> ==
>
> Though the complete patches do not exist, Ankur wants to solve
the problem
> 1 by having a chassis specific MAC. So when packet leaves a
hypervisor for
> east-west
> > Ankur's proposal:
> > ==
> >
> > Though the complete patches do not exist, Ankur wants to solve the
> problem
> > 1 by having a chassis specific MAC. So when packet leaves a hypervisor
> for
> > east-west routing, it uses a unique mac. The disadvantage with this
> > proposal is
Thanks for the summary Guru. I have one question down below.
On 11/09/2018 02:45 PM, Guru Shetty wrote:
I have tried to summarize the problem statement that Numan and Ankur are
trying to solve here based on my understanding so far. Please correct me
and I will revise it along.
Current feature
I have tried to summarize the problem statement that Numan and Ankur are
trying to solve here based on my understanding so far. Please correct me
and I will revise it along.
Current feature set in OVN.
==
A logical switch should only have one localnet logical port. If a
10 matches
Mail list logo
