Re: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK: dpdk_merge pull request for branch-2.10

> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 04:07:42PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > The following changes since commit > 22595b3b763b9eaaf661eec40cc6926557c8696b: > > > > Revert "Work around Python/C JSON unicode differences" (2018-10-15 > 14:44:18 -0700) > > > > are available in the git

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add support to offload GRE tunnels

On 14/10/2018 10:26, Roi Dayan wrote: > > > On 12/10/2018 13:05, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:06:41AM +0300, Roi Dayan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The first patch is to add support to offload to GRE tunnels using tc. >>> THe second patch is to offload the tunnel csum option

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] Support dynamic rebalancing of offloaded flows

Hi Eelco, Thanks for your review and sorry for missing it. I trust that Sriharsha will address it in follow-up patches. 2018/10/19 15:27 Eelco Chaudron : > Hi Simon, > > You might have missed my general comments email before you committed the > patchset to master. > > Just now I also sent my

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add support to offload GRE tunnels

On 22/10/2018 10:53, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 09:16, Roi Dayan > wrote: > > > > On 14/10/2018 10:26, Roi Dayan wrote: > > > > > > On 12/10/2018 13:05, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:06:41AM +0300,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add support to offload GRE tunnels

On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 09:16, Roi Dayan wrote: > > > On 14/10/2018 10:26, Roi Dayan wrote: > > > > > > On 12/10/2018 13:05, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:06:41AM +0300, Roi Dayan wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The first patch is to add support to offload to GRE tunnels using

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v11 06/14] dp-packet: Handle multi-seg mbufs in helper funcs.

> Most helper functions in dp-packet assume that the data held by a > dp_packet is contiguous, and perform operations such as pointer arithmetic > under that assumption. However, with the introduction of multi-segment > mbufs, where data is non-contiguous, such assumptions are no longer >

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS-DPDK public meeting

Next meeting 14th November 2018 16:00 UTC. Minutes for 17th October (apologies for delay) Attendees: Johann, Flavio, Simon, Pieter, Ian, Frikkie, Tiago, Yipeng, Jason, Ophir, Tiago, Kevin. === GENERAL === - 16.11 eol -- 16.11.9 (Dec) is the last planned stable release for DPDK 16.11 --

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-nbctl: Fix the ovn-nbctl test "LBs - daemon" which fails during rpm build

From: Numan Siddique The test "ovn-nbctl: LBs - daemon" fails when it runs the command "ovn-nbctl lb-add lb0 30.0.0.1a 192.168.10.10:80,192.168.10.20:80". ovn-nbctl extracts the vip by calling the socket util function 'inet_parse_active()', and this function blocks when it calls dns_resolve().

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-nbctl: Fix the ovn-nbctl test "LBs - daemon" which fails during rpm build

On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:19:35 +0530 nusid...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Numan Siddique > > The test "ovn-nbctl: LBs - daemon" fails when it runs the command > "ovn-nbctl lb-add lb0 30.0.0.1a 192.168.10.10:80,192.168.10.20:80". ovn-nbctl > extracts the vip by calling the socket util function

[ovs-dev] Issues configuring OVS-DPDK in openstack queens

Hello All, On a 3 node (one controller + 2 compute), we configured Openstack Queens using OSA with OVS. On all the nodes, we defined br-mgmt as linux bridge, br-tun as private network and br-flat as external. Installation was successful and we could create networks and instances on Openstack.

Re: [ovs-dev] [v2.10 1/2] Set release date for 2.10.1.

Hello Justin, On 20/10/2018 00:51, Justin Pettit wrote: > >> On Oct 17, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> >> All of these seem fine to me. > > Thanks. I pushed them to all the various branches. I’ll get the releases out > soon. > > --Justin > Could you also push the tags for these

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v11 05/14] dp-packet: Fix data_len handling multi-seg mbufs.

> When a dp_packet is from a DPDK source, and it contains multi-segment > mbufs, the data_len is not equal to the packet size, pkt_len. Instead, the > data_len of each mbuf in the chain should be considered while distributing > the new (provided) size. > > To account for the above

[ovs-dev] Performance Based Search Ranking!

Hi, Greetings, Is your business on the first page of Google results? If no, we can help you get there! We are trusted digital marketing agency for more than 10 years, our team of 200+ technology specialists, has enabled 1000+ clients to gain a prominent presence on Google and other leading

[ovs-dev] Logo products for your company

Hi, I didn’t know if you had received my email from last week? Can you direct me to the person that handles your company promo items? Do you have any upcoming events, tradeshows or promotional needs? We manufacture ALL custom LOGO and branded products. The most asked about product that we make,

[ovs-dev] Máster en Project Management

--- Este correo electrónico ha sido comprobado en busca de virus por AVG. http://www.avg.com ___ dev mailing

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] RFC for support of PMD Auto load balancing

Hi, Gentle reminder for review. Regards, Nitin -Original Message- From: Nitin Katiyar Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 10:49 AM To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org Cc: Rohith Basavaraja Subject: RE: [PATCH] RFC for support of PMD Auto load balancing Hi, I forgot to mention that this patch does

[ovs-dev] Logo products for your company

Hi, I didn’t know if you had received my email from last week? Can you direct me to the person that handles your company promo items? Do you have any upcoming events, tradeshows or promotional needs? We manufacture ALL custom LOGO and branded products. The most asked about product that we make,

Re: [ovs-dev] [v2.10 1/2] Set release date for 2.10.1.

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:42:19AM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > Hello Justin, > > On 20/10/2018 00:51, Justin Pettit wrote: > > > >> On Oct 17, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> > >> All of these seem fine to me. > > > > Thanks. I pushed them to all the various branches. I’ll get the

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] [1/3]: Routing policies, add config in schema

This Series: Policy-Based Routing. This Patch: Add routing policies in the northbound schema. --- ovn/ovn-nb.ovsschema | 20 - ovn/ovn-nb.xml | 63 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] [2/3] Routing policies, add routing-policies in ovn-nbctl

This Series: Policy-Based Routing This patch: Add commands to ovn-nbctl to add/delete/list routing policies. Routing-policy commands: lr-policy-add ROUTER PRIORITY MATCH ACTION [NEXTHOP] add a policy to router lr-policy-del ROUTER [PRIORITY [MATCH]] lr-policy-list ROUTER print policies for

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] [3/3]: Routing policies, ovn-northd changes to handle routing policy commands.

This Series: Policy-Based Routing. This Patch: Changes in ovn-northd to handle routing policy commands. --- ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c | 144 ++-- tests/ovn-nbctl.at | 47 2 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] Policy-based routing

This patch series implements policy-based routing. Policy-based routing (PBR) provides a mechanism to configure permit/deny and reroute policies on the router. Permit/deny policies are similar to OVN ACLs, but exist on the logical-router. Reroute policies are needed for service-insertion and

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-nbctl: Fix the ovn-nbctl test "LBs - daemon" which fails during rpm build

On 10/22/2018 11:49 AM, nusid...@redhat.com wrote: From: Numan Siddique The test "ovn-nbctl: LBs - daemon" fails when it runs the command "ovn-nbctl lb-add lb0 30.0.0.1a 192.168.10.10:80,192.168.10.20:80". ovn-nbctl extracts the vip by calling the socket util function 'inet_parse_active()',