20/09/2017 19:33, Kevin Traynor:
> On 09/08/2017 10:56 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have compiled and built ovs-dpdk using DPDK v17.08 and OVS v2.8.0. The
> >> NIC that I am using is Mellanox ConnectX-3 Pro, which is a dual port 10G
> >> NIC. The problem with this NIC is that it
21/09/2017 10:04, Loftus, Ciara:
> > 20/09/2017 19:33, Kevin Traynor:
> > > On 09/08/2017 10:56 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> > > > It seems the DPDK function rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name() will
> > > > always return the port ID of the first port on your NIC,
> > > > when you specify the single PCI
Hi Declan,
27/02/2018 16:55, Doherty, Declan:
> Invite for a DPDK community call to discuss the tunnel endpoint hw
> acceleration proposal in this RFC
> (http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-December/084676.html) and the related
> community feedback.
The email does not show the date and time
Hi,
16/11/2018 09:42, Ilya Maximets:
> Hi,
> While discussing the ways to enable DPDK 18.11 new features in OVS
> there was suggestions to use 'rte_eth_devices[]' array directly.
> But this array is marked as '@internal' and also it located in
> the internal header
16/01/2019 12:38, Kevin Traynor:
> On 01/16/2019 11:06 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 16/01/2019 11:56, Kevin Traynor:
> >> On 01/16/2019 10:21 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> But honestly, I doubt you need to talk about representors in this patch.
> >>
16/01/2019 11:03, Ophir Munk:
> Hi Kevin and thank you for your comments.
> Please see inline...
>
> From: Kevin Traynor
> > On 01/15/2019 09:47 AM, Ophir Munk wrote:
> > > Dpdk port representors were introduced in dpdk versions 18.xx.
> > > Prior to port representors there was a one-to-one
16/12/2018 13:02, Ophir Munk:
> Hi Ilya,
> Please find comments inline.
>
> From: Ilya Maximets
> >
> > Not a full review. Just one comment inline.
> >
> > Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> >
> > On 12.12.2018 2:34, Ophir Munk wrote:
> > > Dpdk port representors were introduced in dpdk 18.xx.
>
Hi,
10/01/2019 12:32, Ilya Maximets:
> On 08.01.2019 12:31, Ophir Munk wrote:
> > if (dev->attached) {
> > +/* Remove the port eth device. */
> > rte_eth_dev_close(dev->port_id);
> > -rte_eth_dev_info_get(dev->port_id, _info);
> > -if (dev_info.device &&
10/01/2019 15:23, Ilya Maximets:
> On 10.01.2019 16:42, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 10/01/2019 12:32, Ilya Maximets:
> >> On 08.01.2019 12:31, Ophir Munk wrote:
> >>> if (dev->attached) {
> >>> +/* Remove the
13/02/2019 17:56, Aaron Conole:
> Ilya Maximets writes:
> > And we, actually, already have special ovs-build mail-list. It could
> > be used if you'll decide to choose DPDK way of working with patchwork.
>
> It looks intriguing. I like the idea that anyone could then contribute
> 'check
11/02/2019 18:03, Ben Pfaff:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:24:01AM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > I'm following up on a discussion where we briefly talked about adding
> > a 'check' to OVS patch series during the OVS Conference. 'Check' is
> > what the patchwork project provides to show that
29/04/2019 10:49, Ilya Maximets:
> On 25.04.2019 13:21, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > At last weeks OVS community call [1] the topic of the UNH DPDK lab testing
> > OVS was raised, specifically the issue of the target branches being used so
> > I wanted to kick off a wider discussion on
21/04/2019 11:11, Ophir Munk:
> Thomas - would you like to explain more on the origins of "rte"?
Ian explained (below) the origin quite clearly.
It has been decided in the early days by Intel.
> From: Ian Stokes
> > On 4/17/2019 5:34 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:45:33AM
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:49 PM Timothy Redaelli wrote:
>
> libmnl is not used anymore for MLX5 PMD since DPDK 19.08.
Why don't you use pkg-config?
All these kind of dependencies are managed through libdpdk.pc
which is generated with meson.
___
dev
25/06/2020 13:28, Timothy Redaelli:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:32:23 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:49 PM Timothy Redaelli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > libmnl is not used anymore for MLX5 PMD since DPDK 19.08.
> >
> &g
06/10/2021 19:00, William Tu:
> The patch adds OVS-DPDK supports on Windows.
[...]
> Implementation on Windows
> -
> It's harder than I thought due to my Linux only background.
> Sergey and I first need to add meson build support to OVS, in order
> to make compiling and
15/03/2022 12:14, Stokes, Ian:
> > 15/03/2022 11:27, Stokes, Ian:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > We'd like to put a public meeting in place for the stakeholders
> > > of DPDK and OVS to discuss the next steps and design of
> > > the DSA library along with its integration in OVS.
> >
> > There is no
15/03/2022 11:27, Stokes, Ian:
> Hi All,
>
> We'd like to put a public meeting in place for the stakeholders
> of DPDK and OVS to discuss the next steps and design of
> the DSA library along with its integration in OVS.
There is no DSA library.
Do you mean the IOAT driver in DPDK for the DMA
30/11/2022 16:30, Stokes, Ian:
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > Cc: Thomas and John
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:52 PM Ian Stokes wrote:
> > > diff --git a/.ci/linux-build.sh b/.ci/linux-build.sh
> > > index 23c8bbb7a..0aa90e55e 100755
> > > --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh
> > > +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh
> >
19 matches
Mail list logo
