Hi Han, Numan,
@Han I'll post v2 that is rebased against master with fixes you've mentioned
below. Check my comments.
@Numan I've extended system test and added loadbalancer plus a connection check
- seems to be fine, however I'm having a hell of a time trying to figure out
how to use
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:16 AM Krzysztof Klimonda <
kklimo...@syntaxhighlighted.com> wrote:
>
> If there are snat entries on the router, and some logical_ip are set to
> network instead of an IP address then given SNAT is masquerade. In such
> case ct_snat action is used in lr_in_unsnat table to
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:14:46AM +0100, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> If there are snat entries on the router, and some logical_ip are set to
> network instead of an IP address then given SNAT is masquerade. In such
> case ct_snat action is used in lr_in_unsnat table to ensure that the
> packet is
If there are snat entries on the router, and some logical_ip are set to
network instead of an IP address then given SNAT is masquerade. In such
case ct_snat action is used in lr_in_unsnat table to ensure that the
packet is matched against conntrack and destination IP is replaced with
one from
