On 3/27/24 22:07, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:39 PM Simon Horman wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:08:55PM -0500, Mike Pattrick wrote:
>>> When sending packets that are flagged as requiring segmentation to an
>>> interface that doens't support this feature, send the
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:39 PM Simon Horman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:08:55PM -0500, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> > When sending packets that are flagged as requiring segmentation to an
> > interface that doens't support this feature, send the packet to the TSO
> > software fallback
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:08:55PM -0500, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> When sending packets that are flagged as requiring segmentation to an
> interface that doens't support this feature, send the packet to the TSO
> software fallback instead of dropping it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick
Hi Mike,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:09 PM Mike Pattrick wrote:
>
> When sending packets that are flagged as requiring segmentation to an
> interface that doens't support this feature, send the packet to the TSO
> software fallback instead of dropping it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick
Recheck-request:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 1:14 PM Mike Pattrick wrote:
>
> When sending packets that are flagged as requiring segmentation to an
> interface that doens't support this feature, send the packet to the TSO
> software fallback instead of dropping it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick
For some reason,
