On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:29:28PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:29:28PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:40:21PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:40:21PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:40:21PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for working on making OVN faster and scale better.
> > >
> > > I see what you mean
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:40:21PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for working on making OVN faster and scale better.
> >
> > I see what you mean about how nb_cfg can be a scale problem. Really,
> > each hypervisor only cares
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Thanks for working on making OVN faster and scale better.
>
> I see what you mean about how nb_cfg can be a scale problem. Really,
> each hypervisor only cares about its own row, but each of them is being
> notified about the
Thanks for working on making OVN faster and scale better.
I see what you mean about how nb_cfg can be a scale problem. Really,
each hypervisor only cares about its own row, but each of them is being
notified about the current value in every row. Ideally, we want the HVs
to be able to say to
Acked-By: Venkata Anil
I have reviewed and tested the patch. It looks good to me.
Thanks
Anil
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Anil Venkata
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Han Zhou wrote:
>
>> Anil, thanks for the
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Han Zhou wrote:
> Anil, thanks for the review!
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Anil Venkata
> wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to add a test for this patch i.e testing if hypervisors
> correctly updating
> >
Anil, thanks for the review!
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Anil Venkata
wrote:
>
> Is it possible to add a test for this patch i.e testing if hypervisors
correctly updating
> Chassis_NB_Cfg's nb_cfg when a new value is assigned to NB_Global's
nb_cfg?
> Please see
Is it possible to add a test for this patch i.e testing if hypervisors
correctly updating
Chassis_NB_Cfg's nb_cfg when a new value is assigned to NB_Global's nb_cfg?
Please see other comments inline
Thanks
Anil
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Han Zhou wrote:
> nb_cfg as a
11 matches
Mail list logo