On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:23:44PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:07:38PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Thanks for the series. I actually think that it's pretty close. For
> > me, this series falls into the category of "obviously the right
> > direction
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:07:38PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Thanks for the series. I actually think that it's pretty close. For
> me, this series falls into the category of "obviously the right
> direction but impossible to fully validate before applying it". It
> builds fine and I
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:07:38PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Thanks for the series. I actually think that it's pretty close. For
> me, this series falls into the category of "obviously the right
> direction but impossible to fully validate before applying it". It
I have the same feeling and
Thanks for the series. I actually think that it's pretty close. For
me, this series falls into the category of "obviously the right
direction but impossible to fully validate before applying it". It
builds fine and I was about to push it when I realized that it breaks
most of the unit tests
Hi,
I know this change is not easy to review, but at the same time
we are getting close to the release date. I am afraid that
delaying the acceptance will reduce its exposure and testing.
Please let me know the questions you might have to help you
reviewing this patchset.
Thanks,
fbl
On
