On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Przemyslaw Lal wrote:
> On 18/05/2017 22:41, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> >On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:09:21PM +, Darrell Ball wrote:
> >>
> >>On 4/4/17, 5:47 PM, "Darrell Ball" wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/4/17, 3:09 AM, "Lal, PrzemyslawX"
On 18/05/2017 22:41, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:09:21PM +, Darrell Ball wrote:
On 4/4/17, 5:47 PM, "Darrell Ball" wrote:
On 4/4/17, 3:09 AM, "Lal, PrzemyslawX" wrote:
On 04/04/2017 06:14,
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:09:21PM +, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> On 4/4/17, 5:47 PM, "Darrell Ball" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/4/17, 3:09 AM, "Lal, PrzemyslawX" wrote:
>
> On 04/04/2017 06:14, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
On 4/4/17, 3:09 AM, "Lal, PrzemyslawX" wrote:
On 04/04/2017 06:14, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
> On 4/3/17, 5:27 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of
Przemyslaw Lal"
On 04/04/2017 06:14, Darrell Ball wrote:
On 4/3/17, 5:27 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Przemyslaw Lal"
wrote:
In current implementation port_id is used as an ifindex for all netdev-dpdk
On 4/3/17, 5:27 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Przemyslaw
Lal"
wrote:
In current implementation port_id is used as an ifindex for all netdev-dpdk
interfaces.
For physical DPDK