Re: [ovs-dev] [branch-2.9 PATCH 1/2] netdev-dpdk: Free mempool only when no in-use mbufs.

2018-04-10 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 04/09/2018 03:36 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 04/06/2018 04:51 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: DPDK mempools are freed when they are no longer needed. This can happen when a port is removed or a port's mtu is reconfigured so that a new mempool is used. It is possible that an m

Re: [ovs-dev] [branch-2.9 PATCH 1/2] netdev-dpdk: Free mempool only when no in-use mbufs.

2018-04-10 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 04/09/2018 03:36 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 04/06/2018 04:51 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: DPDK mempools are freed when they are no longer needed. This can happen when a port is removed or a port's mtu is reconfigured so that a new mempool is used. It is possible that an m

Re: [ovs-dev] [branch-2.9 PATCH 1/2] netdev-dpdk: Free mempool only when no in-use mbufs.

2018-04-09 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 04/06/2018 04:51 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> DPDK mempools are freed when they are no longer needed. >>> This can happen when a port is removed or a port's mtu is reconfigured so >>> that a new mempool is used. >>> >>> It is possible that an mbuf is attempted to be returned to a freed mempool >

Re: [ovs-dev] [branch-2.9 PATCH 1/2] netdev-dpdk: Free mempool only when no in-use mbufs.

2018-04-06 Thread Ilya Maximets
>> DPDK mempools are freed when they are no longer needed. >> This can happen when a port is removed or a port's mtu is reconfigured so >> that a new mempool is used. >> >> It is possible that an mbuf is attempted to be returned to a freed mempool >> from NIC Tx queues and this can lead to a segfa

Re: [ovs-dev] [branch-2.9 PATCH 1/2] netdev-dpdk: Free mempool only when no in-use mbufs.

2018-04-05 Thread Stokes, Ian
> DPDK mempools are freed when they are no longer needed. > This can happen when a port is removed or a port's mtu is reconfigured so > that a new mempool is used. > > It is possible that an mbuf is attempted to be returned to a freed mempool > from NIC Tx queues and this can lead to a segfault. >