Hello,
1. Is there an API (other than cli) to retrieve all OpenFlow
entries from ofproto tables ? get first , get next etc ..
2. When an openflow entry/flow is retrieved - how can i
identify/understand the **form** of the entry i.e. what are the
fields/keys to match on ? e.g. ETH + VLAN ,
On 9/8/17, 2:51 AM, "wangyunjian" wrote:
The operations of buckets->connections hmap should with a lock to protect
between
ovs-vswitchd thread and pmd thread(or ct clean thread).But conn_clean()
will release the lock.
This time, the hmap maybe change by other thread and
I didn't realize that there was different information on the mailing
list and in ovs-issues. Thanks for adding the missing information.
"git bisect" would probably take 10 tries or less to find the commit, so
I'd still like to encourage you to try that approach.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 09:27:46P
On 09/11/17 16:20, S hj wrote:
In MANET (mobile ad hoc networks), wireless nodes can communicate
together without any access points.
Should I still consider hostapd for each wireless node in my simulation?
If you aren't running it, probably isn't needed. I mention it only
because you ha
Hi Ben, thank you for getting back to me on this.
I noticed that my previous email with the steps to reproduce was sent to
ovs-dev mailing list. It somewhat felt like the appropriate place to send such
detailed issue.
In any case, I have added those same steps to the open issue in the ovs-issues
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:27:56PM +, Llorente Santos Jesus wrote:
> I have been seeing buggy behaviour with the tunnelling ports of OvS. I would
> like to ask some help in how to properly submit a bug report
> I created an issue in the git "ovs-issues"
> (https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-i
I have been seeing buggy behaviour with the tunnelling ports of OvS. I would
like to ask some help in how to properly submit a bug report
I created an issue in the git "ovs-issues"
(https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues/134) about 2 weeks ago, but
it seems no one is monitoring that.
I
you may want to have a look into how Mininet-WiFi uses OVS in such
scenarios. There is code to reproduce a number of MANET use cases,
plus an active mailing list (cc:)
https://github.com/intrig-unicamp/mininet-wifi/wiki
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
>
>> I am workin
In MANET (mobile ad hoc networks), wireless nodes can communicate together
without any access points.
Should I still consider hostapd for each wireless node in my simulation?
I only run OVS on each node; however, it seems that I have to configure
something to allow nodes to know about the mac addre
> I am working with CORE Network Emulator and I implemented a MANET including
> three wireless nodes.
I am not familiar with MANET, but if this is hostapd based?
>
> I am trying to run OVS on these three nodes. The topology is as follows,
>
> node (1) --- node(2) -- -node(3)
>
>
> In this t
Hello,
I am working with CORE Network Emulator and I implemented a MANET including
three wireless nodes.
I am trying to run OVS on these three nodes. The topology is as follows,
node (1) --- node(2) -- -node(3)
In this topology, for the first step, when I run OVS on wireless nodes as
a normal
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:27:45PM +0800, 顾兆伦 wrote:
> Hi all, sorry to bother you.
>
> When I use python/ovs, idl.run() always costs about 50 ms to execute, and
> it runs 50times, what is too long for me. When I check the
> msg(msg=self._sesson.recv()), I found this:
>
[snip almost 2000 li
According to the FAQ, the version is DPDK 2.0:
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/
If that's incorrect, we should update the FAQ.
i agree with Ben, though, that's it's probably best to use OVS 2.8.
Thanks,
--Justin
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Avi Cohen (A) wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:25:59PM +1200, Brad Cowie wrote:
> On 10 September 2017 at 03:17, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 02:26:04AM +, Chou, David J wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tried to build openvswitch with dpdk enabled debian package
> > (openvswitch-switch-dpdk.2.7.2
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 02:47:56PM +, Ranjith Kumar D wrote:
> I am using DPDK 2.0 for OVS 2.4.0 and DPDK library linking is failing
> while configuring OVS. Is there any specific version of DPDK I should
> use for 2.4.0 OVS ?
OVS 2.4.0 is pretty old. You should probably upgrade to 2.8.0.
___
dpdk-2.1.0.
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
[mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ranjith Kumar D
Sent: Monday, 11 September, 2017 5:48 PM
To: disc...@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] Compatible DPDK version for 2.4.0 OVS
Hi,
I am using DPDK 2.0 for OVS 2.4.0
Hi,
I am using DPDK 2.0 for OVS 2.4.0 and DPDK library linking is failing while
configuring OVS. Is there any specific version of DPDK I should use for 2.4.0
OVS ?
Regards,
Ranjith
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvsw
On 10 September 2017 at 03:17, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 02:26:04AM +, Chou, David J wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to build openvswitch with dpdk enabled debian package
> (openvswitch-switch-dpdk.2.7.2-1.deb) for OVS ver. 2.7.2.
>
> The Debian packaging that comes with OVS
Hi Wang,
I believe that the PMD stats processing cycles includes EMC processing time.
This is just in the context of your results being surprising. It could be a
factor if you are using code where the bug exists. The patch carries a fixes:
tag (I think) that should help you figure out if your
19 matches
Mail list logo