Re: [ovs-discuss] What is the best way to set a Geneve tunnel based on dpdk device

Thank you very much Sara! On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Sara Gittlin wrote: > take a look at vxlan setup - it is similar > http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/userspace-tunneling/ > --Sara > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Hui Xiang

Re: [ovs-discuss] lacp to mellanox switch

> Based upon documentation, this should 'just' work, but well, it doesn't. The > two slave interfaces seem to always be disabled. I have the following: > > # ovs-vsctl add-bond ovsbr0 bond_mlnx enp8s0f0 enp8s0f1 lacp=active > trunks=64,65 After sending that message, I read at the following

[ovs-discuss] To which functions is the first ever incoming packet passed to?

Hello I am in the process of understanding the OVS code following the information given by David in this thread https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs- discuss/2016-March/040236.html So I have the following simple setup where namespaces C1 and C2 are connected to SW1. ip netns add C1 ip

Re: [ovs-discuss] [BUG] Fedora/RHEL build results in "No build ID note found"

Sorry for the delayed answer! Aaron Conole wrote: Thanks for the patch. I'm on Fedora 27, and haven't had any problems building via make rpm-fedora. Additionally, I've done the same on RHEL-7.4 - can you describe your environment a bit more? I've seen reports that this can occur when low on

[ovs-discuss] What is the best way to set a Geneve tunnel based on dpdk device

Hi folks, I have added a dpdk device in ovs bridge 'br-dpdk' in the compute host, and expect the Geneve tunnel can send packets throught this bridge, my question is what is the best way to make it work and do not affect dpdk performance? Is it enough to just assign an ip to interface