Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN vm on vlan network using geneve tunnel for external traffic

2018-04-13 Thread Han Zhou
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:44:25PM +0530, Anil Venkata wrote: > >>> vm

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN vm on vlan network using geneve tunnel for external traffic

2018-04-13 Thread Russell Bryant
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:44:25PM +0530, Anil Venkata wrote: >>> vm created on a vlan tenant network is using geneve tunnel(between compute >>> and

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN vm on vlan network using geneve tunnel for external traffic

2018-04-13 Thread Russell Bryant
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:44:25PM +0530, Anil Venkata wrote: >> vm created on a vlan tenant network is using geneve tunnel(between compute >> and gateway nodes) to reach external network. Because of this, we need to >> consider

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN vm on vlan network using geneve tunnel for external traffic

2018-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:44:25PM +0530, Anil Venkata wrote: > vm created on a vlan tenant network is using geneve tunnel(between compute > and gateway nodes) to reach external network. Because of this, we need to > consider tunnelling overhead while assigning MTU for vlan network. Can we >

[ovs-discuss] OVN meetup at VMware, May 15

2018-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
In the OVN meeting this week, we discussed doing an in-person meetup of OVN developers and other interested people on May 15. I volunteered to host at VMware. I suggest 2pm to 4pm. If you're interested in attending, please reply to me or to the thread. If people want to attend remotely, we can

Re: [ovs-discuss] There's no available (non-isolated) pmd thread on numa node 0, Expect reduced performance.

2018-04-13 Thread Alan Kayahan
Hi Ian, > As you are setting all lcore and pmd core to node 1 why are you giving 1024 memory to node 0? > When processing packets for this port it means cpu is accessing data across the numa nodes which causes a performance penalty I am benchmarking performance in different settings and trying to