Thanks Ben for replying. It seems we can have this as user may need to change
or add TCP option.
For example, the Load Balance Fullnat mode, if we want to use OVS to implement
LB Fullnat function, we can choose to add client IP address in TCP option
Thanks,
Daniel.
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 1:37 AM,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:51:05PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:15 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:42:15PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:18 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:43 PM Be
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:29:37AM +0700, Soe Ye Htet wrote:
> Dear OvS Team,
>
> I have one problem in openvswitch. Let me state my simple tested toplogy.
> OVS1(RYU)---OVS2. Instead of applying ovs inband mode, I configure my
> own predefiend fules in OvS1 & 2 to apply in band scemario accor
Honestly the best thing to do is probably to propose a design or, if
it's simple enough, to send a patch. That will probably be more
effective at sparking a discussion.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 03:33:48PM +, venugopal iyer wrote:
> Hi:
> Just wanted to check if folks had any thoughts on the u
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 01:23:15PM +0800, benli ye wrote:
> Does anyone know if OVS supports to add TLV option for TCP header now?
No, it doesn't.
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
Guys,
Any comments to OVS upgrade to dpdk 18.08?
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=72606
Regards,
Ophir
> -Original Message-
> From: Stokes, Ian [mailto:ian.sto...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 5:52 PM
> To: Andrzej Ostruszka ; ovs-discuss@ope
Hi:
Just wanted to check if folks had any thoughts on the use case Girish outlined
below. We do have
a real use case for this and are interested in looking at options for
supporting more than one VTEP IP.It is currently a limitation for us, wanted to
know if there are similar use cases folks ar
> Hello all,
>
> I remember some time ago there was topic raised here about new LTS
> release. I'd like to ask related question - what version of DPDK will it
> be based on? 18.11 (which is going to be new LTS release of DPDK)?
>
Yes, the plan would be ideally to move to DPDK 18.11.
> If it i
Hello all,
I remember some time ago there was topic raised here about new LTS
release. I'd like to ask related question - what version of DPDK will
it be based on? 18.11 (which is going to be new LTS release of DPDK)?
If it is then is there anybody already working on that?
I'm asking these que
On 10/31/2018 5:40 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote:
Greg, I submitted this patch [1], let me know if anything looks bad.
[1] https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-October/353410.html
I'll have a look and comment there.
Thanks!
Thanks
Jaime.
-Original Message-
From: Ja
On 10/31/2018 4:07 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote:
Let me give it a try.
Aside for the fix on master, who takes care of mapping the fix to
bugfix releases?
Jaime,
The maintainers will take care of backporting to previous release
branches where the fix is appropriate.
Thanks,
- Greg
BR
Ja
Greg, I submitted this patch [1], let me know if anything looks bad.
[1] https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-October/353410.html
Thanks
Jaime.
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
Reply-to: jcaam...@suse.com
To: Gregory Rose , ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject:
Let me give it a try.
Aside for the fix on master, who takes care of mapping the fix to
bugfix releases?
BR
Jaime.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Rose
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org, jcaam...@suse.de
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Problems executing decap(eth)+encap(eth)
actions
Date: Tu
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Alan Kayahan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have 3 OVS bridges on the same host, connected to each other as
> > br1<->br2<->br3. br1 and br3 are connected to the docker container cA
> > via dpdkvhostuser port type (I know it is deprecated, the app works
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo