Hello folks,
I am writing to share a problem and fix, and also ask a question.
I found a problem this week which caused OVN GW data-plane down. After
onboarding a hypervisor to existing OVN deployment where a lot a
hypervisors and VMs have been running well, suddenly all GW nodes' all BFD
tunnel
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:43 PM Gregory Rose wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 3:17 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
> >
> > I see. It appears you are right and I misread the documentation. OK,
> > l'll investigate further then.
> >
> > - Greg
> >
> >
>
> Siva,
>
> I am still looking into this but wanted to update
On 11/6/2018 3:17 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
I see. It appears you are right and I misread the documentation. OK,
l'll investigate further then.
- Greg
Siva,
I am still looking into this but wanted to update you on my status.
I am seeing problems with the vxlan local_ip option myself.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 08:57:00AM -0500, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Thanks for the e-mail, Ben. I'm 100% behind this effort. The performance
> benefits and the potential drop in CPU usage of OVN components is absolutely
> worth it. I have some questions inline below with regards to specific points
>
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:24:02AM +, Srinivas via discuss wrote:
> We have a system where we support linux bond mode 1(Active backup) and bond
> mode 4(LACP). The bonds are pre-created on boot up.Can we add these bonds as
> a ports to the ovs bridge without breaking any of the linux bond
>
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:48:58AM +0500, Ramzah Rehman wrote:
> I was just running ryu app simple_switch_15.py with ovs-vswitchd version
> 2.10.90 but the controller threw error. Is Openflow15 not supported by ovs
> 2.10.90? If that's the case, how to enable support for OpenFlow15? I had
> set
Thanks for the e-mail, Ben. I'm 100% behind this effort. The performance
benefits and the potential drop in CPU usage of OVN components is
absolutely worth it. I have some questions inline below with regards to
specific points you've brought up.
On 11/02/2018 01:44 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I was
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 06:21:22PM -0500, Siva Teja ARETI wrote:
> Yes. Packet counts are incremented.
>
> [root@vm1 ~]# ovs-ofctl dump-ports testbr0
> OFPST_PORT reply (xid=0x2): 3 ports
> port LOCAL: rx pkts=0, bytes=0, drop=68726, errs=0, frame=0, over=0, crc=0
>tx pkts=0,
