Re: [ovs-discuss] GRE over IPv6 configuration

2019-06-18 Thread Eli Britstein
On 6/18/2019 8:11 PM, William Tu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:15 AM William Tu wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:46 PM Eli Britstein wrote: >>> >>> On 6/18/2019 1:22 AM, Gregory Rose wrote: On 6/12/2019 2:20 AM, Eli Britstein wrote: > Could you please have a look (and even

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpctl del-flow works strange

2019-06-18 Thread Levente Csikor
Hi Ben, it's OK, behavior accepted :) But, I still cannot remove a specific entry without specifying the 'ufid'. Would you be so kind as to give me an example of how to remove a given entry without 'ufid'? Thanks On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 09:33 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > In general, we don't pay

Re: [ovs-discuss] GRE over IPv6 configuration

2019-06-18 Thread Gregory Rose
On 6/18/2019 10:11 AM, William Tu wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:15 AM William Tu wrote: Hi Greg and Eli, Should we add both ip6gre (L3) and ip6gretap (L2) support? @Eli, which mode do you want to use? I apply the patch below, and ip6gretap port can be created successfully by doing using

Re: [ovs-discuss] VxLAN in Userspace

2019-06-18 Thread Vasu Dasari
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:21 PM Flavio Leitner wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:41:16AM -0400, Vasu Dasari wrote: > > Flavio, > > > > The device(could be a regular interface) should have been added to OVS > with > > "add-port" and when it is removed, ARP entries learnt on it well be >

Re: [ovs-discuss] GRE over IPv6 configuration

2019-06-18 Thread Gregory Rose
On 6/18/2019 11:28 AM, Gregory Rose wrote: That's pretty much the same patch I've got and am testing right now.  I think it's the right way to go.  Do you want to post this to netdev or would you prefer me to do it? Excuse me, I meant OVS dev, not NET dev... Thanks, - Greg

Re: [ovs-discuss] GRE over IPv6 configuration

2019-06-18 Thread Gregory Rose
On 6/18/2019 10:11 AM, William Tu wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:15 AM William Tu wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:46 PM Eli Britstein wrote: On 6/18/2019 1:22 AM, Gregory Rose wrote: On 6/12/2019 2:20 AM, Eli Britstein wrote: Could you please have a look (and even better try?) still

Re: [ovs-discuss] GRE over IPv6 configuration

2019-06-18 Thread Gregory Rose
On 6/18/2019 9:15 AM, William Tu wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:46 PM Eli Britstein wrote: On 6/18/2019 1:22 AM, Gregory Rose wrote: On 6/12/2019 2:20 AM, Eli Britstein wrote: Could you please have a look (and even better try?) still need to tidy up

Re: [ovs-discuss] GRE over IPv6 configuration

2019-06-18 Thread William Tu
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:15 AM William Tu wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:46 PM Eli Britstein wrote: > > > > > > On 6/18/2019 1:22 AM, Gregory Rose wrote: > > > > > > On 6/12/2019 2:20 AM, Eli Britstein wrote: > > >> Could you please have a look (and even better try?) still need to > > >>

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-nsh]How to implement NSH function

2019-06-18 Thread Ziyu Wu via discuss
Hi Ben, I found it now, Thanks a lot ;)  On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 04:14:15PM +, Ziyu Wu via discuss wrote: > I want to test NSH features as OVS 2.9+ has been added NSH support. > > But I don’t know how to write the flow entries(actions/fields, As mentioned by Jaime, It’s

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-nsh]How to implement NSH function

2019-06-18 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 04:14:15PM +, Ziyu Wu via discuss wrote: > I want to test NSH features as OVS 2.9+ has been added NSH support. > > But I don’t know how to write the flow entries(actions/fields, As mentioned > by Jaime, It’s different from nsh-patch version). > > Where can I get some

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpctl del-flow works strange

2019-06-18 Thread Ben Pfaff
In general, we don't pay much attention to OVS behavior here, because this isn't something users should do. On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:10:40AM +0800, Levente Csikor wrote: > Minor update: > Iperf was using different source port when re-initiated, so this is why > it became again part of fast

[ovs-discuss] [ovs-nsh]How to implement NSH function

2019-06-18 Thread Ziyu Wu via discuss
Hi experts, Good days. I want to test NSH features as OVS 2.9+ has been added NSH support. But I don’t know how to write the flow entries(actions/fields, As mentioned by Jaime, It’s different from nsh-patch version). Where can I get some further instructions/examples for reference? I

Re: [ovs-discuss] VxLAN in Userspace

2019-06-18 Thread Flavio Leitner via discuss
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:41:16AM -0400, Vasu Dasari wrote: > Flavio, > > The device(could be a regular interface) should have been added to OVS with > "add-port" and when it is removed, ARP entries learnt on it well be removed > as well. Not necessarily. You could have a regular kernel

Re: [ovs-discuss] GRE over IPv6 configuration

2019-06-18 Thread William Tu
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:46 PM Eli Britstein wrote: > > > On 6/18/2019 1:22 AM, Gregory Rose wrote: > > > > On 6/12/2019 2:20 AM, Eli Britstein wrote: > >> Could you please have a look (and even better try?) still need to > >> tidy up > >> > >>

[ovs-discuss] OVS and vxlan processor on the same host

2019-06-18 Thread Miroslav Kubiczek
Hello, Is it possible to setup openvswitch with a server which process vxlan traffic on the same host? I'd like to setup vxlan with: sudo ovs-vsctl add-port br0 vtep -- set interface vtep type=vxlan option:remote_ip=127.0.0.1 option:key=flow ofport_request=10 Then I'd like to start my

Re: [ovs-discuss] VxLAN in Userspace

2019-06-18 Thread Vasu Dasari
Flavio, The device(could be a regular interface) should have been added to OVS with "add-port" and when it is removed, ARP entries learnt on it well be removed as well. The code is ready. Regarding, testing the code I am planning on extending already existing case where tests are performed to

[ovs-discuss] [ovn-loadbalance]Not all subnets can connect to vip

2019-06-18 Thread taoyunupt
Hi, I have deployed ovn with openstack/octavia. I have four subnets,that are 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0, 192.168.3.0, 192.168.4.0, which are added to a logical router. vips : {"192.168.1.8:22"="192.168.1.2:22,192.168.2.2:22,192.168.3.2:22"} I found that if I