:88
config: 0
state: LIVE
current:10MB-FD COPPER
speed: 10 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My other question is does ovs/ovn support pre-population of tunnel's info
> in the fdb/arp table
My other question is does ovs/ovn support pre-population of tunnel's info
in the fdb/arp table.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I have a problem on vms spawned between twp physical hosts within same
> subnet.
Thank you very much Sara!
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Sara Gittlin <sara.gitt...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> take a look at vxlan setup - it is similar
> http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/userspace-tunneling/
> --Sara
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Hui Xiang
Hi folks,
I have added a dpdk device in ovs bridge 'br-dpdk' in the compute host,
and expect the Geneve tunnel can send packets throught this bridge, my
question is what is the best way to make it work and do not affect dpdk
performance?
Is it enough to just assign an ip to interface
Thanks Numan, so sorry for occupying your much time on it. I have fixed the
problem, but not with very clear reason, after the cloud completed
deployment with puppet(not TrippleO), no matter what I am using, either
'pcs' or 'crm', the resource just could not start as it is expected. but if
I use
com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Numan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping, I am following your pcs example, but still with no
>>> lucky,
>>>
>>&
_SUCCESS}
Please take a look, thank you very much.
Hui.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Numan Siddique <nusid...@redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI, If I have configured a good ovndb-server
FYI, If I have configured a good ovndb-server cluster with one active two
slaves, then start pacemaker ovn-servers resource agents, they are all
becoming slaves...
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Numan Siddique <nusid...@redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:2
ch/839022/
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Numan Siddique <nusid...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi Hui Xiang,
>
> Can you please try with this patch [1] and see if it works for you ?
> Please let me know how it goes. But I am not sure, if the patch would fix
> the issue.
&g
sid...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi Hui Xiang,
>
> Can you please try with this patch [1] and see if it works for you ?
> Please let me know how it goes. But I am not sure, if the patch would fix
> the issue.
>
> To brief, the OVN OCF script doesn't add monitor action for &q
Hi folks,
I am following what suggested on doc[1] to configure the ovndb_servers
HA, however, it's so unluck with upgrading pacemaker packages from 1.12 to
1.16, do almost every kind of changes, there still not a ovndb_servers
master promoted, is there any special recipe for it to run? so
t;. Since
> these fields are used for setting the correct eth.dst in the ARP reply
> (eth.src and eth.dst are swapped from the actual ARP request), it won't
> know where the deliver the packet, as "00:00:00:00:00:00" is not valid,
> and hence the output="_MC_unknow
Hi folks,
I am a bit confused of the OVN logical router port arp flow process if
arping it from external side.
When I am tracing the logical router port arp, it always seems there would
be no response from the flow procedure, however, I do can get the arp
response and reach it.
My trace inport
-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg101556.html
Cause the NAT doesn't work in my environment, I am trying to debug why,
please see previous email, thanks much for your help.
Hui.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Guru Shetty <g...@ovn.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 12 November 2017 at 2
aster/NEWS
[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg101556.html
[3] http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/
Hui.
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
> I am now debugging OVN NAT with openstack, networki
Hi Folks,
I am now debugging OVN NAT with openstack, networking-ovn. now I am blocked
at the dnat action step, if anyone can give a help or hint would be really
appreciated.
VM instance has fixedip 20.0.0.2 and floatingip 172.16.0.131
Below are the lflow-trace, openflow-trace and related
By manually adding nat-addresses=router for logical router type switch port
make it go further, above are not the problem now, thanks all.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The ovn-trace target to vm floatingip is finally identified as MC_unknown
0, uuid 83de4750
outport = "_MC_unknown";
output;
multicast(dp="public", mcgroup="_MC_unknown")
-
egress(dp="public", inport="provnet-668bf1", outport="provnet-668bf1")
Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> Is update_sb_monitors() in ovn-controller.c not doing the right thing to
> ensure that localnet ports are present? That is the first place to
> look, I think.
>
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:36:12PM +0800
}
parent_port : []
tag : []
tunnel_key : 3
type: ""
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> When I am running ovn in one of my node having the gateway port
> connected external network via localnet,
Hi folks,
When I am running ovn in one of my node having the gateway port connected
external network via localnet, the patch port can't be created between
br-ex(set by ovn-bridge-mappings) with br-int, after gdb, it seems the
result get from SBREC_PORT_BINDING_FOR_EACH (binding, ctx->ovnsb_idl)
rg/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-January/327255.html
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:28:53PM +0800, Hui Xiang wrote:
> > I am trying to understand clone action deeply and checking the patch
> > related with 'clone'[
Hi folks,
I am trying to understand clone action deeply and checking the patch
related with 'clone'[1], where said "The clone action provides an action
envelope to enclose an action list." and "The clone action is very similar
with the OpenFlow clone action recently added", but sorry I am not
Thanks Ben, that is much helpful explanation.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 06:04:16PM +0800, Hui Xiang wrote:
> > Is the patch port output logistic within function
> apply_nested_clone_actions
> > ? S
, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Hui Xiang wrote:
> >Seems it works with the same datapath type during the discussion in
> [1]
> > by finally done a flow of leaving two kernel netdev port
Hi folks,
Seems it works with the same datapath type during the discussion in [1]
by finally done a flow of leaving two kernel netdev port communicate
together.
But in my case I have a setup with two bridges has different datapath
type, netdev and system, need to be connected, port_A(in
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM
>
> *To: *Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 3:18 AM
> *To: *Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
.
[image: Inline image 1]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
> *Cc: *"ovs-discus
Thanks Darrell, comment inline.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of Hui Xiang <
> xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:47
Hi guys,
Seems OVS-DPDK still missing IP fragmentation support, is there any
schedule to have it? I'm transferring to use OVN, but for those nodes
which have external network connection, they may face this problem, except
to configure Jumbo frames, is there any other workaround?
BR.
Hui.
Your help was greatly appreciated, thanks Bodireddy.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>What is your use case(s) ?
> >>My usecase might be setup a VBRAS VNF with OVS-DPDK as an NFV normal
> >>case, and it requires a good
Thanks much Bodireddy again! comment inline.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> It’s a long weekend in US and will try answering some of your questions in
> Darrell's absence.
>
> >Why do think having more than 64k per PMD would
Thanks Darrell, comment inline.
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 6:57 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
> *Cc: *&quo
ore so that there
> is
> >64k
> >>flows per thread.
> >
> >AFAIK, the no. of flows here may not have to do anything with LLC. Also
> there
> >is EMC cache(8k entries) of ~4MB per PMD thread.
> >Yes the performance will be nice with simple test cases
memory bound.
>
>
>
> BTW, on my DUT the LLC is 35MB and has 28 cores and so the assumption
> of 2.5M/core isn't right.
>
>
>
> - Bhanuprakash.
>
>
>
> >
>
> >On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>
>
MB and has 28 cores and so the assumption of
> 2.5M/core isn't right.
>
> - Bhanuprakash.
>
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Thanks Darrell,
> >
> >More questions:
> >Why not allocating 64k for eac
I guess the answer is now the general LLC is 2.5M per core so that there is
64k flows per thread.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Darrell,
>
> More questions:
> Why not allocating 64k for each dpcls? does the 64k ju
Anyone could help to answer it?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have seen that there will be one dpcls instance for each port per pmd,
> and seems flow table max entries num is 64k per pmd other than per dp
Thanks Darrell.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 11:35 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
> *Cc: *"ovs-discus
I see, it is exactly what you said, thanks.
So to analyze or enhance performance, the value of "avg processing cycles
per packet" should be looked to evaluate ovs-dpdk, which gives the result
of processsing cycles per packet for a specified pmd, right?
Hi guys,
I got below results on my environment, but confusing with the cycles
percents, it looks like the polling plus processing cycles per pmd is 100%,
but as I recalled there are some improvment document that showed their
processing cycles are 100% percents which means 0 for polling cycles?
43 matches
Mail list logo
