ds to log to a different directory.
Jaime.
-Original Message-
From: Numan Siddique
To: Aaron Conole
Cc: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz , ovs-discuss
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Handling conf.db ownership on OVS_USER_ID
changes
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 19:20:28 +0530
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 9:3
vs-discuss] Handling conf.db ownership on OVS_USER_ID
changes
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:07:24 -0700
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 09:30, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> So the non root owned log directory (and run directory) is shared
> between non root OVS processes and ro
.
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
Reply-to: jcaam...@suse.com
To: Ansis Atteka
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org, Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Handling conf.db ownership on OVS_USER_ID
changes
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:52:32 +0200
> You also need to chown /var/log/openvswi
suse.de
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org, Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Handling conf.db ownership on OVS_USER_ID
changes
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:21:48 -0700
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 17:20, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
wrote:
>
> My intention was doing it at systemd unit (prestart) for file conf.db
g
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Handling conf.db ownership on OVS_USER_ID
changes
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:25:24 -0700
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:32:21PM +0200, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote:
> When sysconfig OVS_USER_ID is changed to a different user, it
> requires
> a manual ownership change
Hello
When sysconfig OVS_USER_ID is changed to a different user, it requires
a manual ownership change of the OVS conf.db database if existing or
otherwise ovsdb-server will fail to (re)start. I was wondering if I am
missing any particular reason why this is change of ownership is not
...@suse.de
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Latest maintenace release not announced or
available for download
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:15:29 -0700
Justin, you had some information on this, can you follow up?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:41:03AM +0100, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote
@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Latest maintenace release not announced or
available for download
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:22:43 -0700
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:09:07PM +0100, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote:
> Is there any reason why the latest maintenance releases have not been
> announc
Hello
Is there any reason why the latest maintenance releases have not been
announced yet and are not available for download at the usual URL
https://www.openvswitch.org/releases/
Thanks,
Jaime.
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
Greg, I submitted this patch [1], let me know if anything looks bad.
[1] https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-October/353410.html
Thanks
Jaime.
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
Reply-to: jcaam...@suse.com
To: Gregory Rose , ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject
: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:42:15 -0700
On 10/29/2018 3:38 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote:
> Hey Greg. Thanks for helping out. I did build OVS with the fix and it
> got my problem sorted without causing any additional ones on my
> environment. Let me know if I can help with anything else.
>
...@suse.de
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Problems executing decap(eth)+encap(eth)
actions
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:42:51 -0700
On 10/19/2018 1:39 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote:
> Hello
>
> When using nsh encapsulation, it's useful to normalize your pipeline
> to
> packet_type=nsh, pop
Hi Jiri
Did you have the chance to take a look at this?
Thanks,
Jaime.
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
Reply-To: jcaam...@suse.com
To: Jiri Benc , Yi Y Yang
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Bad checksums observed with nsh
encapsulation
Date: Fri
Hello Jiri
I will try to explain in more detail and provide a simple scenario to
reproduce.
Lets look first into the vm2vm scenario with no nsh, just a tcp packet
taken from on vm port and put into the other vmp port. The originating
vm requests checksum offload. OVS just clones the buffer into
skb);
}
Tried that and got rid of my problem.
Any thoughts?
BR
Jaime.
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
Reply-To: jcaam...@suse.com
To: jcaam...@suse.com, ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Bad checksums observed with nsh
encapsulation
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 18
: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
Reply-To: jcaam...@suse.com
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org, jcaam...@suse.de
Subject: [ovs-discuss] Bad checksums observed with nsh encapsulation
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:51:59 +0200
Hello
I am facing a problem where eth+nsh encapsulated packets egress OVS
with incorrect
Hello
I am facing a problem where eth+nsh encapsulated packets egress OVS
with incorrect checksum.
The scenario is
client vnf server
all guests on the same host so this is vm2vm traffic, tap ports are
directly added to the ovs bridge. TCP traffic from/to server port 80 is
Hello Srikanth
OVS 2.9 already has nsh support so those patches no longer apply.
Problem is that ODL SFC does not yet support OVS 2.9 nsh
implementation, support which is planned for next release Fluorine. If
you want to use ODL SFC I suggest that you stay with OVS 2.6.1 for now.
BR
Jaime.
18 matches
Mail list logo
