Re: [ovs-discuss] dpdk-lcore-mask

On 10/05/2023 07:10, Eli Britstein wrote: -Original Message- From: Ilya Maximets Sent: Tuesday, 9 May 2023 21:04 To: Eli Britstein ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org Cc: Kevin Traynor ; Aaron Conole ; i.maxim...@ovn.org Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] dpdk-lcore-mask External email: Use

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] After enable dpdk，many threads were affinitied only to the first lcore cpu.

On 15/02/2023 05:50, ChangLimin wrote: Before enable dpdk, all ovs-vswitch threads were affinitied to cpu 0-27. Cpu 28-31 were isolated in grub, will used for pmd. After enable dpdk, many threads were affinitied only to the first lcore cpu. Below is the output: # ovs-vsctl --no-wait set

Re: [ovs-discuss] release schedule change proposal

On 15/11/2021 14:58, Thomas Monjalon wrote: For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) This schedule has multiple issues: - clash with China's Spring Festival - too many

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance

On 30/10/2021 06:07, Satish Patel wrote: Folks, I have configured ovs-dpdk to replace sriov deployment for bonding support. everything good but somehow as soon as i start hitting 200kpps rate i start seeing packet drop. I have configured CPU isolation as per documentation to assign a dedicated

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk: can't set n_txq for dpdk interface

On 07/03/2021 03:57, George Diamantopoulos wrote: > Hello all, > > It appears that setting the n_txq option has no effect for dpdk Interfaces, > e.g.: "ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdk-eno1 options:n_txq=2". > > n_txq appears to be hardcoded to "5" for my driver (BNX2X PMD), for some > reason. >

Re: [ovs-discuss] include/sparse/rte_flow.h

On 20/11/2019 18:14, Stokes, Ian wrote: > > > On 11/20/2019 6:02 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote: >> On 19/11/2019 18:48, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> On 19.11.2019 19:01, Eli Britstein wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/19/2019 7:46 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>>

Re: [ovs-discuss] include/sparse/rte_flow.h

On 19/11/2019 18:48, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 19.11.2019 19:01, Eli Britstein wrote: >> >> On 11/19/2019 7:46 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> On 19.11.2019 18:29, Eli Britstein wrote: On 11/19/2019 7:27 PM, Eli Britstein wrote: > Hi > > I see this file has many inconsistencies

Re: [ovs-discuss] time for another LTS?

On 10/18/2018 10:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I've had a number of queries from folks lately about our roadmap for LTS > releases. It has, indeed, been a long time since we've had a long-term > support release (the current LTS is 2.5). Usually, we've done LTS > releases before some kind of big

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

ep >>>> <venkatesan.prad...@ericsson.com>; Stokes, Ian >>>> <ian.sto...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org >>>> Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Flavio Leitner >>>> <f...@redhat.com>; Loftus, Ciara <ciara.lof...@inte

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

On 01/26/2018 05:21 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 26.01.2018 18:47, Kevin Traynor wrote: >> hOn 01/26/2018 03:16 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> On 26.01.2018 15:00, Stokes, Ian wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Recently an issue was raised regar

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

On 01/26/2018 05:27 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:48 PM >> To: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>; Stokes, Ian >> <ian.sto...@intel.com>;

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

hOn 01/26/2018 03:16 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 26.01.2018 15:00, Stokes, Ian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Recently an issue was raised regarding the move from a single shared mempool >> model that was in place up to OVS 2.8, to a mempool per port model >> introduced in 2.9. >> >>

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] mbuf pool sizing

On 01/23/2018 11:42 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 01/17/2018 07:48 PM, Venkatesan Pradeep wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Assuming that all ports use the same MTU, in OVS2.8 and earlier, a single >> mempool of 256K buffers (MAX_NB_MBUF = 4096 * 64) will be created and

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] mbuf pool sizing

On 01/17/2018 07:48 PM, Venkatesan Pradeep wrote: > Hi, > > Assuming that all ports use the same MTU, in OVS2.8 and earlier, a single > mempool of 256K buffers (MAX_NB_MBUF = 4096 * 64) will be created and shared > by all the ports > > With the OVS2.9 mempool patches, we have port specific

Re: [ovs-discuss] pmd-cpu-mask/distribution of rx queues not working on windows

On 11/14/2017 04:43 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 11/14/2017 02:16 AM, aserd...@ovn.org wrote: >>> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] pmd-cpu-mask/distribution of rx queues not >>> working on windows >>> >>> On 10/19/2017 05:45 PM, Alin Gabriel Serdean wrote:

Re: [ovs-discuss] pmd-cpu-mask/distribution of rx queues not working on windows

On 11/14/2017 02:16 AM, aserd...@ovn.org wrote: >> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] pmd-cpu-mask/distribution of rx queues not >> working on windows >> >> On 10/19/2017 05:45 PM, Alin Gabriel Serdean wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> Currently the test “pmd-cpu-mask/distribution of rx queues” is failing

Re: [ovs-discuss] pmd-cpu-mask/distribution of rx queues not working on windows

On 10/19/2017 05:45 PM, Alin Gabriel Serdean wrote: > Hi, > > > > Currently the test “pmd-cpu-mask/distribution of rx queues” is failing > on Windows. I’m trying to figure out what we are missing on the Windows > environment. Any help is welcomed . > > Hi Alin, the queues are sorted by

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] adding dpdk ports sharing same pci address to ovs-dpdk bridge

wat <devendra.rawat.si...@gmail.com> >> Date: Monday, September 18, 2017 at 4:27 AM >> To: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> >> Cc: Darrel Ball <db...@vmware.com>, "ovs-...@openvswitch.org" > d...@openvswitch.org>, "disc...@openvswitch.org&q

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] adding dpdk ports sharing same pci address to ovs-dpdk bridge

On 09/07/2017 06:47 PM, Darrell Ball wrote: > Adding disc...@openvswitch.org > > The related changes went into 2.7 > > > > On 9/7/17, 3:51 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of devendra > rawat" devendra.rawat.si...@gmail.com>

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

On 09/06/2017 02:43 PM, Jan Scheurich wrote: >> >> I think the mention of pinning was confusing me a little. Let me see if I >> fully understand your use case: You don't 'want' to pin >> anything but you are using it as a way to force the distribution of rxq from >> a single nic across to PMDs

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

On 09/06/2017 02:33 PM, Jan Scheurich wrote: > Hi Billy, > >> You are going to have to take the hit crossing the NUMA boundary at some >> point if your NIC and VM are on different NUMAs. >> >> So are you saying that it is more expensive to cross the NUMA boundary from >> the pmd to the VM that

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

On 09/06/2017 08:03 AM, 王志克 wrote: > Hi Darrell, > > pmd-rxq-affinity has below limitation: (so isolated pmd can not be used for > others, which is not my expectation. Lots of VMs come and go on the fly, and > manully assignment is not feasible.) > >>After that PMD threads on cores