Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 8:52 PM
> To: Kevin Traynor ; Stokes, Ian ;
> Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep
> ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Flavio Leitner ; Loftus, Ciara ;
> Kava
Some more observations
Regards,
Pradeep
> -Original Message-
> From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-
> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesan Pradeep
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 11:04 PM
> To: Jan Scheurich ; Stokes, Ian
Pfaff (b...@ovn.org) ; acon...@redhat.com; Venkatesan Pradeep
Subject: RE: Mempool issue for OVS 2.9
> -Original Message-
> From: Stokes, Ian [mailto:ian.sto...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, 26 January, 2018 13:01
> To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Kevin Traynor ;
inal Message-
From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:15 AM
To: Venkatesan Pradeep ;
ovs-...@openvswitch.org; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org; Robert Wojciechowicz
; Ian Stokes ; Ilya
Maximets ; Kavanagh, Mark B
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] mbuf pool sizi
Hi,
Assuming that all ports use the same MTU, in OVS2.8 and earlier, a single
mempool of 256K buffers (MAX_NB_MBUF = 4096 * 64) will be created and shared by
all the ports
With the OVS2.9 mempool patches, we have port specific allocation and the
number of mbufs created for each port is based
