On 12/17/20 6:24 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/2020 3:55 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 12/16/20 9:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 02:30:29AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 11/12/20 6:04 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2020 5:10 AM, Mark
On 12/17/2020 3:55 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 12/16/20 9:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 02:30:29AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 11/12/20 6:04 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
On 11/12/2020 5:10 AM, Mark Gray wrote:
On 30/10/2020 18:32, Gregory Rose wrote:
The question
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 6:55 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
IIRC, during the conference Han mentioned that they are relying on OOT
> module
> for STT support. And I also noticed a patch from Vitaly to fix some issue
> in STT part of the kernel module. Both CC-ed.
>
> Han, Vitaly, do you have some
On 12/16/20 9:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 02:30:29AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 11/12/20 6:04 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2020 5:10 AM, Mark Gray wrote:
On 30/10/2020 18:32, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> The question is whether there is any
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 02:30:29AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 11/12/20 6:04 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/12/2020 5:10 AM, Mark Gray wrote:
> >> On 30/10/2020 18:32, Gregory Rose wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The question is whether there is any interest in continuing to support
> >>> the
On 11/12/20 6:04 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2020 5:10 AM, Mark Gray wrote:
>> On 30/10/2020 18:32, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>>
>>> The question is whether there is any interest in continuing to support
>>> the OVS out-of-tree (OOT) kernel driver or should we deprecate it? The
>>> latest
