Awesome thanks Ben!
- Amar
On 3/14/18, 4:49 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
I finally fixed this upstream in Git, and the fix will be in the next
releases on the 2.8 and 2.9 branches.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 06:06:22AM +, Amar Padmanabhan wrote:
> Yup thanks we
I finally fixed this upstream in Git, and the fix will be in the next
releases on the 2.8 and 2.9 branches.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 06:06:22AM +, Amar Padmanabhan wrote:
> Yup thanks we are unblocked!
> - Amar
>
> On 12/6/17, 12:36 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> OK.
>
>
Yup thanks we are unblocked!
- Amar
On 12/6/17, 12:36 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
OK.
In the meantime, you can add "eth()" to the flows you're tracing to get
the expected results.
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 07:02:42PM +, Amar Padmanabhan wrote:
> Thanks
OK.
In the meantime, you can add "eth()" to the flows you're tracing to get
the expected results.
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 07:02:42PM +, Amar Padmanabhan wrote:
> Thanks Ben for taking a look,
> Regards,
> - Amar
>
> On 12/6/17, 10:17 AM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> On Wed,
Thanks Ben for taking a look,
Regards,
- Amar
On 12/6/17, 10:17 AM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:58:41AM +, Amar Padmanabhan wrote:
> We are debugging a setup and are seeing something that we are finding it
hard to explain.
>
> 1 - Here is
Hi,
We are debugging a setup and are seeing something that we are finding it hard
to explain.
1 - Here is the ovs-dpctl dump-flows output.
recirc_id(0),in_port(3),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(dst=192.168.128.0/255.255.255.0,frag=no),
packets:550, bytes:53900, used:0.364s,