Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

Ok, that answers my question. Thank you. On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 11:13 AM Ben Pfaff wrote: > No. A JSON object can have any number of members. > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:06:21AM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote: > > Thanks Ben for clarification. So it means one Monitor request can

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

No. A JSON object can have any number of members. On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:06:21AM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote: > Thanks Ben for clarification. So it means one Monitor request can request > for only one Table monitoring, correct? > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Ben Pfaff

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

is a JSON object. A JSON object maps from keys to values, so we only need one. Your specification for is wrong because it says that it is a JSON array. It is not. On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:32:06PM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote: > Hello Ben, > > I have one more observation. I request you to

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

Hello Ben, I have one more observation. I request you to please read it carefully. If we go by the current monitor method definition, there can be only in one monitor RPC method. If it is expected to have only one i.e. one table and an array of , then the current specification is good. o

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

No. The "Reported-by:" tag is really just a kind of "thank-you". Thanks again. On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:50:32PM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote: > Thanks you Ben! I saw the other patch email as well. Since it is says that > "reported-by" me, do I have any further action item on me? > > /anil. > >

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

Thanks you Ben! I saw the other patch email as well. Since it is says that "reported-by" me, do I have any further action item on me? /anil. On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Ah, OK, you're saying that there's a missing [] around the > . This goes back to a

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:03:13PM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote: > Hi, > > The RFC7047 states below about the Monitor request. > > The request object has the > >following members: > >o "method": "monitor" > >o "params": [, , ] > >o "id": > > > The parameter is used to