Hi,
Speaking about control plane, such slow down can be related to
neutron-ovs-agent or ovsdbapp which is used by it.
I don’t know exactly what version of OpenStack and ovsdbapp You are using but I
remember that there was big issue with performance of port list in ovsdbapp
some time ago. This
Hi all,
If you are using ovsdbapp (python) then the problem might be there or in the
OVS python IDL as you mention it’s control plane.
We did quite a few optimizations in both areas that should speed port handling
up.
However there is things that needs more perfomance as for example we are
Hi Ben and Flavio,
Thanks for responding. I should clarify that the performance problem is with
the control plane, not the data plane.
What we’re encountering is more like the problem described here
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2014-September/034907.html
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 04:44:42PM -0300, Flavio Leitner via discuss wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:50:48PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:52:22AM -0500, William Konitzer wrote:
> > > I'm reading
> > > (http://www.openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-vswitchd.8.txt
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:50:48PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:52:22AM -0500, William Konitzer wrote:
> > I'm reading
> > (http://www.openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-vswitchd.8.txt
> > section LIMITS) and it says "Performance will degrade beyond 1,024
> > ports per
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:52:22AM -0500, William Konitzer wrote:
> I'm reading
> (http://www.openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-vswitchd.8.txt
> section LIMITS) and it says "Performance will degrade beyond 1,024
> ports per bridge due to fixed hash table sizing.” Do we have a little
> more
Hi
I'm reading (http://www.openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-vswitchd.8.txt
section LIMITS) and it says "Performance will degrade beyond 1,024 ports per
bridge due to fixed hash table sizing.” Do we have a little more info on what
that means and what to expect for less experienced users
