Re: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.7.90] testsuite: 2180 failed

Hi Nick, Looks like there's another report of trouble with this test below. Would you be able to take a look? On 20 March 2017 at 07:44, Aynur Shakirov wrote: > For latest master the OVS build of deb package unsuccessfully ends because > test "flush the fdb and mdb

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS supported hardware switches

This is good information to have. Thanks Tony and Stephen. I didn't know that Open Switch used anything from OVS other than ovsdb-server. Maybe I'll have a look sometime. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:21:37PM +1300, Tony van der Peet wrote: > We use a dpif implementation (based very much on

[ovs-discuss] incorrect tcp checksum - inner packet of vxlan tunnel

Hello, I'm running ovs-dpdk with vxlan tunnel Setup like http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/userspace-tunneling/ I'm running iperf3 on the endpoints VMs - and I see incorrect TCP checksum at the server side (this is seen after vxlan decap) I don't think this is ovs-dpdk issue - since

[ovs-discuss] OVS and RSTP

Hi, I'd like to forward BPDUs transparently in the OVS environment. Would it be possible to let the OVS Bridge do not process RSTP fames and instead treat them as special traffic and mark them with special VLAN in order to let the internal VM Linux bridges run RSTP (BPDU tunneling). another

Re: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.7.90] testsuite: 2180 failed

Yes, thanks for your report. I try to find what might cause this. Thanks. Nick > On Mar 21, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Joe Stringer wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > Looks like there's another report of trouble with this test below. > Would you be able to take a look?

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

It did not tell me anything: *Mar 20 11:42:23 ovs-vsctl: ovs|1|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk options:dpdk-devargs=:00:0a.0* *Mar 20 11:42:23 ovs-vswitchd[23906]: ovs|00042|bridge|WARN|could not open network device dpdk-p0 (No such

[ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

Hi, I have DPDK 16.11.1 and OVS 2.6.1, with 1 Gb Huge page/ and 2 NICs bound with Igb_uio drivers. I run in to trouble while creating DPDK ports on the OVS bridge. *ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk* works perfectly fine. But, *ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0

[ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

Hi all I need to specify a number of classes of service according to DSCP bits. Each class of service should be associated with a priority. For example: Packet A is sent with a DSCP value of 0 and packet B is sent with a value of 46; 0 has a lower priority than 46. Packet A arrives before

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:36:23AM +0100, Advith Nagappa wrote: > Hi, > > I have DPDK 16.11.1 and OVS 2.6.1, with 1 Gb Huge page/ and 2 NICs bound > with Igb_uio drivers. > > I run in to trouble while creating DPDK ports on the OVS bridge. > > > *ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface

[ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.7.90] testsuite: 2180 failed

For latest master the OVS build of deb package unsuccessfully ends because test "flush the fdb and mdb when topology changed" is fail. Test added to git in commit 427e9751f30067357262f58fdf5af55df4b6debf Env: Ubuntu 16.04.1 with latest updates, compiler is gcc 5.3.1, dpdk enabled. Log:

[ovs-discuss] in-band control traffic port

Hi everyone, Using in-band control, I've observed by Wireshark that the OFPT_HELLO packet is captured on one interface(ethX added to OVS bridge). Originally, I thought that all of the ports of the bridge direct the control traffic. The reason is that in in-band.c, the hidden flow only specify the

[ovs-discuss] OVS benchmark for kernel datapath module

Hi everyone, I'm doing benchmark for the OVS kernel datapath module. i'm trying to see the effect of different packet sizes, data rates and hardware on the performance. i'm wondering if there are similar benchmarks available or if any relevant information is available. Thanks *Best Regards*

[ovs-discuss] OVS/DPDK STT Support

We are playing with OVS/DPDK and have noticed that STT does not seem to be supported in userspace. Wondering if anyone happens to be working on implementing this or has any suggestions for making it work Testing on OVS 2.7.9 and DPDK 16.11 thanks Luca.