Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

Regarding the question: “Also, what is OVS-2.6.1's version on options:dpdk-devargs='', by that I mean, how does the dpdk port know which interface should it bind to when its not specified.. “ Here is a previous thread that answers this question:

Re: [ovs-discuss] Reinstall OVS from git repo

Hi Guru, It shows only one instance. Does it make sense if I have re-installed OVS? Ethan 2017年3月22日 01:04，"Guru Shetty" 寫道： On 21 March 2017 at 09:01, 蘇于倫 wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to confirm which steps should I do to completely

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK: socket permissions' problem

From: on behalf of Aynur Shakirov Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK: socket permissions' problem Hello. Meta. OVS ver:

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS benchmark for kernel datapath module

Thanks for the information. *Best Regards* *Danish Sattar* On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vasmi Abidi wrote: > > There are recordings of presentations about OVS performance at the OVS > conference web page. > > For example:

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

Hi Ian, Yes, I am using OVS-2.6.1 release. And yes, you are correct. *ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk*, infact fails in 2.6.1; whereas, *ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk1 -- set Interface dpdk1 type=dpdk, * succeeds. As regards the use of

Re: [ovs-discuss] RSTP for OVS in mininet

On 21 March 2017 at 13:43, Haitham Ghalwash wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to test RSTP on a mininet topology. when running > > sudo ovs-vsctl set Bridge s1 rstp_enable=true > > I am getting the following error > > ovs-vsctl: Bridge does not contain a column whose name

[ovs-discuss] RSTP for OVS in mininet

Hi all, I am trying to test RSTP on a mininet topology. when running sudo ovs-vsctl set Bridge s1 rstp_enable=true I am getting the following error ovs-vsctl: Bridge does not contain a column whose name matches "rstp_enable" the STP is running OK, but I am unable to set the RSTP. any

Re: [ovs-discuss] How does OVS learns the remote MACs

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:00:15AM -0700, Chris Mantis wrote: > I think as OVS support OVSDB, it can learn the remote MACs from the OVSDB > controller, but I guess this is not native support. If possible, can you > provide an outline of how this control path can be supported natively? Can > you

Re: [ovs-discuss] Reinstall OVS from git repo

On 21 March 2017 at 09:01, 蘇于倫 wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to confirm which steps should I do to completely remove current > OVS if I want to re-install OVS with modified C code in git repo ? > > Currently what my reinstall_ovs.sh does for old OVS removal

[ovs-discuss] Reinstall OVS from git repo

Hi everyone, I'd like to confirm which steps should I do to completely remove current OVS if I want to re-install OVS with modified C code in git repo ? Currently what my reinstall_ovs.sh does for old OVS removal is: sudo /usr/local/share/openvswitch/scripts/ovs-ctl stop sudo rm

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

>Hi all > >I need to specify a number of classes of service according to DSCP bits. Each >class of service should be associated with a priority. For example: Packet A is >sent with a DSCP value of 0 and packet B is sent with a value of 46; 0 has a >lower priority than 46. Packet A arrives before

Re: [ovs-discuss] New dpif provider registration

Hi Ben, Thank you for your reply. We are offloading ovs functionalities to our hardware accelerator. We would like to know if there is any way to load shared libraries of our call backs, in the context of vswitchd? On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:34:59PM +, Santhosh Alladi wrote: > We have

[ovs-discuss] Relationship between struct flow and struct dp_packet_batch

Hi I have a question about the relationship between struct flow and struct dp_packet_batch. I can access multiple packets (inside dp_packet_batch) and only one flow (aux->flow) in dp_execute_cb(). It seems to me the packets in dp_packet_batch must be the same type (aux->flow->dl_type) or must

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

Apologies for top posting, Hi Advith, there seems to be a mismatch of OVS versions and expected features from the details you have provided. To confirm you are using OVS 2.6.1? Is there a specific commit ID you are using? Or are you using the 2.6.1 tag or release package? From the commands

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

I don’t see the pci memory mapping logs here. Can you also attach the full dpdk logs ? I have attached the dpdk-log. For PCI mapping, may below helps: *Bus info Device Class Description* ** *pci@:00:07.0 ens7

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

That’s right; that is what I meant by “this is yet even further away from your needs” On 3/20/17, 11:50 PM, "Ali Volkan Atli" wrote: I know ingress/egress policier but they cannot give me traffic prioritization, right? - Volkan

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

From: Darrell Ball Date: Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:12 PM To: Advith Nagappa , Ben Pfaff Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK From: on

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

I know ingress/egress policier but they cannot give me traffic prioritization, right? - Volkan From: Darrell Ball [db...@vmware.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Ali Volkan Atli; disc...@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] High

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

For completeness There is also ingress side policing for DPDK support, but this is yet even further away from your needs On 3/20/17, 11:08 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Darrell Ball" wrote: Afaik

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

Afaik OVS-DPDK only supports egress-policing qos http://openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-vswitchd.conf.db.5.pdf see egress--policer On 3/20/17, 10:30 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ali Volkan Atli"