Hello,
I'm having issues forwarding a flow that is encapsulated with nsh+ethernet.
Below is the syslog error message. I'm using ovs v2.9.90 and Linux kernel
4.13.0-32-generic.
Jan 29 20:23:49 checkout ovs-vswitchd:
ovs|00672|dpif(handler5)|WARN|system@ovs-system: failed to put[create]
(Invalid
Yesterday, the ACM SOSR awards committee announced that it was granting
Open vSwitch its second annual Software Systems Award, which is given to
recognize the development of a software system that has had a
significant impact on SDN research, implementations, and tools. The
award comes along with
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
> Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35
> To: Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep
> ; Stokes, Ian
> ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:52:34AM +0800, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:39:29PM +0800, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In the openflow, we set no-flood PodMod operation through openflow 1.0;
> for
> >> later openflow versions, no-flood is dropped.
> >> We can refer to
On 01/26/2018 05:21 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 26.01.2018 18:47, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> hOn 01/26/2018 03:16 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 26.01.2018 15:00, Stokes, Ian wrote:
Hi All,
Recently an issue was raised regarding the move from a single shared
mempool model that
On 01/26/2018 05:27 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:48 PM
>> To: Ilya Maximets ; Stokes, Ian
>> ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
>> Cc: Flavio
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 8:03 AM
> To: Stokes, Ian ; Ilya Maximets
> ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Flavio Leitner ; Loftus, Ciara
>
Hi,
I'd like to take one step back and look at how much many mbufs we actually need.
Today mbufs are consumed in the following places:
a) Rx queues of *physical* dpdk ports: dev->requested_n_rxq *
dev->requested_rxq_size
Note 1: These mbufs are hogged up at all times.
Note 2: There
On 28.01.2018 21:34, Venkatesan Pradeep wrote:
> Some more observations
>
> Regards,
>
> Pradeep
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-
>> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesan Pradeep
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018
On 29.01.2018 11:19, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to take one step back and look at how much many mbufs we actually
> need.
>
> Today mbufs are consumed in the following places:
>
> 1. Rx queues of **physical** dpdk ports: dev->requested_n_rxq *
> dev->requested_rxq_size
>
On 29.01.2018 11:50, Jan Scheurich wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
>> Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35
>> To: Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep
>> ; Stokes, Ian
>>
>On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:39:29PM +0800, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the openflow, we set no-flood PodMod operation through openflow 1.0;
for
>> later openflow versions, no-flood is dropped.
>> We can refer to below two macro definitions.
>>
>> #define OFPPC10_ALL (OFPPC_PORT_DOWN |
12 matches
Mail list logo