Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

Hello Ben, I have one more observation. I request you to please read it carefully. If we go by the current monitor method definition, there can be only in one monitor RPC method. If it is expected to have only one i.e. one table and an array of , then the current specification is good. o

[ovs-discuss] (no subject)

My question is two: 1.ovs user state ping normal, but iperf is not normal, how to solve? What are the functions supported by the 2.netdev type bridge?___ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

No. The "Reported-by:" tag is really just a kind of "thank-you". Thanks again. On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:50:32PM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote: > Thanks you Ben! I saw the other patch email as well. Since it is says that > "reported-by" me, do I have any further action item on me? > > /anil. > >

Re: [ovs-discuss] The discrepancy in the Monitor request composition.

Thanks you Ben! I saw the other patch email as well. Since it is says that "reported-by" me, do I have any further action item on me? /anil. On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Ah, OK, you're saying that there's a missing [] around the > . This goes back to a

Re: [ovs-discuss] tap ports...

On 03/07/2018 12:56 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: Q: I created a tap device tap0, configured an IP address on it, and added it to a bridge, like this:: $ tunctl -t tap0 $ ip addr add 192.168.0.123/24 dev tap0 $ ip link set tap0 up $ ovs-vsctl add-br br0 $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0

Re: [ovs-discuss] Including bfd status for tunnel endpoints on ovs-vsctl show

This is nice option to have. On 07-Mar-2018 6:27 PM, "Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo" wrote: > > As OVN started implementing L3HA with the use of BFD monitoring, after > discussing with the people who is doing QA and thinking about future > troubleshooting of the feature, they

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

OK. I guess we need to investigate this issue from the basics. On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:02:02PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: > With OVS 2.8 branch it never shrank when I started to delete the ports since > the DB sizes didn't grow, which makes sense to me. The conditions weren't > met

Re: [ovs-discuss] Including bfd status for tunnel endpoints on ovs-vsctl show

I will submit it tomorrow, I wanted to share the idea first to make sure it made sense. Thank you, Miguel Ángel. On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:41 PM Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:56:49PM +, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > > As OVN started implementing L3HA with

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on OpenVSwitch 2.9

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 11:47:48AM +0100, woz woz wrote: > Dear support, > I’m testing OpenVSwitch version 2.9. on my infrastructure using CentOS7, > but I’m having any problem, below my config: > I have 4 servers with the public IP address, e.g. > A-> 1.1.1.1 > B-> 2.2.2.2 > C-> 3.3.3.3 > D->

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

With OVS 2.8 branch it never shrank when I started to delete the ports since the DB sizes didn't grow, which makes sense to me. The conditions weren't met for further compaction. See attached image. NB: 2018-03-07T18:25:49.269Z|9|ovsdb_file|INFO|/opt/stack/data/ovs/ovnnb_db.db: compacting

Re: [ovs-discuss] openvswitch userspace mode can not use iperf send packet，whatever tcp and udp

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:22:48AM +0800, ♂漢唐峻傑♀ wrote: > ovs userspace mode how to install in centos7, datapath-type=netdev ， > What does “netdev” stand for? "network device" > as well as with the meter table relation I don't understand this question.

Re: [ovs-discuss] tap ports...

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:31:30PM -0700, Grant Taylor via discuss wrote: > Can OVS create tap ports like OpenVPN or KVM (Qemu) or User Mode Linux use? > I.e. an Ethernet interface inside OVS and a socket that applications can > glom onto and use. > > I think I can create the tap interfaces

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

No worries, I just triggered the test now running OVS compiled out of 2.8 branch (2.8.3). I'll post the results and investigate too. I have just sent a patch to fix the timing issue we can see in the traces I posted. I applied it and it works, I believe it's good to fix as it gives us an idea of

[ovs-discuss] Problem on OpenVSwitch 2.9

Dear support, I’m testing OpenVSwitch version 2.9. on my infrastructure using CentOS7, but I’m having any problem, below my config: I have 4 servers with the public IP address, e.g. A-> 1.1.1.1 B-> 2.2.2.2 C-> 3.3.3.3 D-> 4.4.4.4 between these servers I've configured a VXLAN tunnel, in this way :

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

OK, thanks. If this is a lot of trouble, let me know and I'll investigate directly instead of on the basis of a suspected regression. On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:06:50PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: > All right, I'll repeat it with code in branch-2.8. > Will post the results once the test

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

All right, I'll repeat it with code in branch-2.8. Will post the results once the test finishes. Daniel On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:53:15PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: > > Repeated the test with 1000 ports this time. See

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:53:15PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: > Repeated the test with 1000 ports this time. See attached image. > For some reason, the sizes grow while deleting the ports (the > deletion task starts at around x=2500). The weird thing is why > they keep growing and the

[ovs-discuss] Apples to apples kernel vs userspace

Hello everyone, I have googled extensively but am not able to find a simple apples-to-apples comparison of userspace vs kernel data path OVS performance. Is there a handy comparison floating around for reference? Thanks, -- Blue Lang VP, Engineering *| *Veracity 3423 Piedmont Rd NE Suite 400

Re: [ovs-discuss] segmentation fault when adding a VF in DPDK to a switch

Hi Ian, Thanks a lot for your patch. I applied your modifications and ran again the setup described in the original post. While the CRC-related error message has disappeared, openvswitch still crashes (with no gdb running!): # tail ovs-vswitchd.log 2018-03-07T14:58:53.311Z|00215|dpdk|INFO|EAL:

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

Right, thanks Mark! Good point about the 4x, I missed that one. I'm repeating the test for 1K ports. Not sure if I'll be able to reproduce the 2.5GB part but it is still weird that while deleting ports (actually deleting stuff from the DB) it doesn't get to compact the DB further (last time it

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

On 03/07/2018 07:40 AM, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: Hi folks, During the performance tests I've been doing lately I noticed that the size of the Southbound database was around 2.5GB in one of my setups. I couldn't dig further then but now I decided to explore a bit more and these are the

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

BTW, I didn't spot any of these messages in the log: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/4cc9d1f03f83e9fac90a77ddaca0af662b2758b1/ovsdb/file.c#L615 I'll add a few traces to figure out why the auto compact is not triggering. Also, I could see the trace when I ran it manually:

[ovs-discuss] OVN Database sizes - Auto compact feature

Hi folks, During the performance tests I've been doing lately I noticed that the size of the Southbound database was around 2.5GB in one of my setups. I couldn't dig further then but now I decided to explore a bit more and these are the results in my all-in-one OpenStack setup using OVN as a

[ovs-discuss] Including bfd status for tunnel endpoints on ovs-vsctl show

As OVN started implementing L3HA with the use of BFD monitoring, after discussing with the people who is doing QA and thinking about future troubleshooting of the feature, they proposed something the thing on $subject. What do you think? For example, in this case: