Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-04-15 Thread Venkatesan Pradeep
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 8:52 PM > To: Kevin Traynor ; Stokes, Ian ; > Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep >

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-04-12 Thread Ilya Maximets
On 11.04.2018 20:55, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 04/10/2018 11:12 AM, Stokes, Ian wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com] > Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35 > To: Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-04-11 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 04/10/2018 11:12 AM, Stokes, Ian wrote: -Original Message- From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com] Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35 To: Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep ; Stokes, Ian

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-04-10 Thread Stokes, Ian
> >> -Original Message- > >> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com] > >> Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35 > >> To: Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep > >> ; Stokes, Ian > >> ;

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Jan Scheurich
> -Original Message- > From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com] > Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35 > To: Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep > ; Stokes, Ian > ; d...@openvswitch.org > Cc:

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 01/26/2018 05:21 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 26.01.2018 18:47, Kevin Traynor wrote: >> hOn 01/26/2018 03:16 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> On 26.01.2018 15:00, Stokes, Ian wrote: Hi All, Recently an issue was raised regarding the move from a single shared mempool model that

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 01/26/2018 05:27 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:48 PM >> To: Ilya Maximets ; Stokes, Ian >> ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org >> Cc: Flavio

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Stokes, Ian
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 8:03 AM > To: Stokes, Ian ; Ilya Maximets > ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org > Cc: Flavio Leitner ; Loftus, Ciara >

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Jan Scheurich
Hi, I'd like to take one step back and look at how much many mbufs we actually need. Today mbufs are consumed in the following places: a) Rx queues of *physical* dpdk ports: dev->requested_n_rxq * dev->requested_rxq_size Note 1: These mbufs are hogged up at all times. Note 2: There

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Ilya Maximets
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 11:04 PM >> To: Jan Scheurich <jan.scheur...@ericsson.com>; Stokes, Ian >> <ian.sto...@intel.com>; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org >> Cc: Ilya Maximets (i.maxim...@samsung.com) <i.maxim...@samsung.com>; >> Flav

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Ilya Maximets
On 29.01.2018 11:19, Jan Scheurich wrote: > Hi, >   > I'd like to take one step back and look at how much many mbufs we actually > need. >   > Today mbufs are consumed in the following places: > > 1. Rx queues of **physical** dpdk ports: dev->requested_n_rxq * > dev->requested_rxq_size >

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-29 Thread Ilya Maximets
On 29.01.2018 11:50, Jan Scheurich wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com] >> Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35 >> To: Jan Scheurich ; Venkatesan Pradeep >> ; Stokes, Ian >>

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-26 Thread Flavio Leitner
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:16:02PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 26.01.2018 15:00, Stokes, Ian wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Recently an issue was raised regarding the move from a single shared > > mempool model that was in place up to OVS 2.8, to a mempool per port model > > introduced in 2.9.

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-26 Thread Stokes, Ian
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:48 PM > To: Ilya Maximets ; Stokes, Ian > ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org > Cc: Flavio Leitner ; Loftus, Ciara >

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-26 Thread Kevin Traynor
hOn 01/26/2018 03:16 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 26.01.2018 15:00, Stokes, Ian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Recently an issue was raised regarding the move from a single shared mempool >> model that was in place up to OVS 2.8, to a mempool per port model >> introduced in 2.9. >> >>

Re: [ovs-discuss] Mempool issue for OVS 2.9

2018-01-26 Thread Ilya Maximets
On 26.01.2018 15:00, Stokes, Ian wrote: > Hi All, > > Recently an issue was raised regarding the move from a single shared mempool > model that was in place up to OVS 2.8, to a mempool per port model introduced > in 2.9. > >