Hi,
I found this interesting conversation about LTS.
Perhaps another option would be to use an intermediate version like 2.6
instead of using a 2.11 if we want to upgrade the current old LTS
version ?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:53:53PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:53:53PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:23:37AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:48:07AM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > > On 10/18/2018 10:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > > I've had a number of queries from folks lately
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:23:37AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:48:07AM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > On 10/18/2018 10:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > I've had a number of queries from folks lately about our roadmap for
> > > > LTS releases. It has, indeed, been a long
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:48:07AM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > On 10/18/2018 10:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > I've had a number of queries from folks lately about our roadmap for
> > > LTS releases. It has, indeed, been a long time since we've had a
> > > long-term support release (the current
> On 10/18/2018 10:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > I've had a number of queries from folks lately about our roadmap for
> > LTS releases. It has, indeed, been a long time since we've had a
> > long-term support release (the current LTS is 2.5). Usually, we've
> > done LTS releases before some kind
On 10/18/2018 10:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I've had a number of queries from folks lately about our roadmap for LTS
> releases. It has, indeed, been a long time since we've had a long-term
> support release (the current LTS is 2.5). Usually, we've done LTS
> releases before some kind of big
I've had a number of queries from folks lately about our roadmap for LTS
releases. It has, indeed, been a long time since we've had a long-term
support release (the current LTS is 2.5). Usually, we've done LTS
releases before some kind of big architectural change, etc., and so
we've had no real