Hi,
On 28/08/2018 02:38, menkeyi wrote:
> [root@compute01 ~]# uname -r
> 3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64
>
> 1、Ovs vxlan mode is available
> 2、Ovs + DPDK vxlan mode is not available
>
Can you provide a bit more info here? What in specific do you see not
working, or not available? And when you say "Ovs
Hi Anirudh,
Are you still facing this issue?
I was able to replicate your issues by using your vm1-dpdk.xml config.
You seem to have an extra node that isn't on the
configuration example pointed out by Ian before [1]. If you take the
following out of your config it should work fine:
.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/#phy-vm-phy-vhost-loopback
Regards,
Tiago.
On 04/10/2018 21:06, Onkar Pednekar wrote:
> Hi Tiago,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Below are the answers to your questions in-line.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 4:07 AM Lam, Tiago <mailto
Hi,
I have a couple of questions, but at a first glance this seems to be a
result of OvS-DPDK not yet supporting TSO, while the Kernel does. We are
in the works of addressing that.
The numbers you are reporting, ~9.4 Gbps vs ~5.5 Gbps are very similar
to the ones we have been getting with and
Hi Onkar,
Thanks for your email. Your setup isn't very clear to me, so a few
queries in-line.
On 04/10/2018 06:06, Onkar Pednekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been experimenting with OVS DPDK on 1G interfaces. The system has
> 8 cores (hyperthreading enabled) mix of dpdk and non-dpdk capable ports,
On 30/11/2018 17:17, LIU Yulong wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:36 PM Lam, Tiago <mailto:tiago@intel.com>> wrote:
>
> On 30/11/2018 02:07, LIU Yulong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply, please see my inline comments
On 03/12/2018 10:18, LIU Yulong wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 1:17 AM LIU Yulong <mailto:liuyulong...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:36 PM Lam, Tiago <mailto:tiago@intel.com>> wrote:
>
> On 30/11
On 30/11/2018 02:07, LIU Yulong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply, please see my inline comments below.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:00 PM Lam, Tiago <mailto:tiago@intel.com>> wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2018 08:24, LIU Yulong wrote:
> > Hi,
On 29/11/2018 08:24, LIU Yulong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently tested ovs-dpdk, but we met some bandwidth issue. The bandwidth
> from VM to VM was not close to the physical NIC, it's about 4.3Gbps on a
> 10Gbps NIC. For no dpdk (virtio-net) VMs, the iperf3 test can easily
> reach 9.3Gbps. We
Hi,
A few comments in-line.
On 27/11/2018 13:20, 张萌 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I`m using “ovs-appctl ofproto/trace “ to trace the flows in ovs-dpdk.
>
> When integrated with conntrack, the ovs rule ended in the
> table=10, which will record the ct as the flowing flow:
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
