Hi,
OVS can be deployed in userspace with DPDK.
You can follow the installation guide in documents to do this
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst
As regards features in
> -Original Message-
> From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-
> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Avi Cohen (A)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 1:19 PM
> To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-discuss] how to tell devstack to run my openvswitch
> This article https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/using-open-vswitch-
> and-dpdk-with-neutron-in-devstack says: "If you have the NICs installed
> entirely on a NUMA Node other than 0, you will encounter a bug that will
> prevent correct OVS setup. You may wish to move your NIC device to a
>
Hi All,
There are a number of useful blogs maintained by Intel for OVS-DPDK. These
range from simple 'how-to' articles for specific feature to more technical deep
dives of how features work under the hood.
Currently these blogs are hosted on the Intel Developer Zone (and will continue
to be),
Apologies for top posting,
Hi Advith, there seems to be a mismatch of OVS versions and expected features
from the details you have provided.
To confirm you are using OVS 2.6.1? Is there a specific commit ID you are
using? Or are you using the 2.6.1 tag or release package?
From the commands
Hi Mohan,
OVS 2.5.2 is not compatible with DPDK 16.11.1. OVS 2.5 can be used with DPDK
2.2.
The mapping of supported OVS and DPDK versions are available in the releases
document for OVS (see link below).
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/
If DPDK 16.11.1 is a requirement I
> Hi, all
>
> Does ovs-dpdk support QoS on dpdkvhostuser port and other port, just like
> 'HTB' for kernel based ovs port?
>
> Or will ovs-dpdk support this?
Hi Sam,
Currently ovs-dpdk does not support HTB for QoS. In terms of what can be
applied to a vhost user port (and other dpdk port
> > At the last OVS-DPDK community sync meeting the issue of bug reporting
> > and tracking was raised. Specifically
> >
> > 1. What is currently available?
> > 2. Are there any improvements that can be made in the process?
> >
> > As it stands the process to follow is defined at:
> >
> >
> Thank you , earlier I had enabled only 'CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS=y'
> , compilation is successful after enabling 'CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST=y'
> configuration.
Your welcome, glad it worked for you.
Ian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stokes, Ian [mailto:ian.sto...
> I mean the step configure was successful (./configure --with-
> dpdk=/home/ubuntu/dpdk-2.0.0/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc) .
It's been a while since I've used OVS 2.4 but from what I remember with DPDK
2.0 it used vhost cuse and there were extra steps required to enable the vhost
cuse
82599 family of NICs do have support. Their
datasheets have the specifics with regards to capabilities.
Thanks
Ian
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Stokes, Ian [mailto:ian.sto...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 09 October, 2017 1:10 PM
> > To: Greg Rose; Avi Coh
> On 10/03/2017 05:35 AM, Avi Cohen (A) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > These Intel NIC's: X540, 82599, I40E - supports IPsec offload But I
> > don't see that the drivers supplied by Intel - handle it (??) Also I
> > don't see any reference in the DPDK userspace drivers
> librte_pmd_ixgbe.c ..
> > Can
> Hi Team
>
> I'm having 2 VMs running with ovs-dpdk as a networking agent on openstack
> compute node.
Could you provide more detail on the components you are running (OVS and DPDK
versions etc.).
> When I'm checking the external connectivity of the VMs by pinging to the
> external world,the
Hi Yangyunlong,
Thanks for your email and work investigating the issue.
DPDK 17.11 is not supported by default for OVS 2.8.1. OVS 2.8.1 uses DPDK
17.05.2. Typically support for new DPDK versions are not backported between
releases so as such this is not a bug.
However support for DPDK 17.11
> Does the OVS support HW IPsec offload ? can OVS configure the NIC/Network
> adapter to ipsec a specific flow ?
Hi Avi, this feature isn't available in OVS currently from what I'm aware of.
Ian
> Thank You
> Avi
> ___
> discuss mailing list
>
Hi All,
Recently an issue was raised regarding the move from a single shared mempool
model that was in place up to OVS 2.8, to a mempool per port model introduced
in 2.9.
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2018-January/046021.html
The per port mempool model was introduced in
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:48 PM
> To: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>; Stokes, Ian
> <ian.sto...@intel.com>; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Flavio Leitner &l
Hi Ricardo,
That’s for reporting the issue and providing the steps to reproduce.
I was able to reproduce this with an i40e VF using igb_uio.
In short it seems there is no support currently for ixgbe and i40e VF devices
in OVS with DPDK.
There are 2 issues at play here. First is the
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 8:03 AM
> To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Ilya Maximets
> <i.maxim...@samsung.com>; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Flavio Leitner &l
2.10 development cycle at some point. I can
post an update here when there is progress.
Thanks
Ian
From: scaricapo...@gmail.com [mailto:scaricapo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Riccardo Ravaioli
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:35 PM
To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>
Cc: ovs-d
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, 29 January, 2018 09:35
> >> To: Jan Scheurich <jan.scheur...@ericsson.com>; Venkatesan Pradeep
> >> <venkatesan.prad...@eri
> One of the OVS-DPDK maintainers will have to speak up about the flow
> control messages. I don't know.
Hi Michael,
can you provide the following to help debug this:
OVS Version.
DPDK Version.
NIC Model.
pmd-cpu-mask.
lcore mask.
Port configuration for all ports (including flow control, queue
Hi,
I was able to reproduce the issue on my system.
As you are setting all lcore and pmd core to node 1 why are you giving 1024
memory to node 0?
I saw the same issue on my system but the warning did not appear once memory
was allocated to node 1 only.
I would think the VM being launched is
Hi Michael,
Are you using dpdk vhostuser ports in this deployment?
I would expect to see them listed in the output of ovs-appctl
dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show you posted below.
Can you describe the expected traffic flow ( Is it North/South using DPDK phy
devices as well as vhost devices or
[mailto:hsy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 8:05 AM
To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] There's no available (non-isolated) pmd thread on
numa node 0, Expect reduced performance.
Hi Ian,
> As you are setting all lcor
me [mailto:1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:23 PM
To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
Hi Ian,
In the deployment i do have vhost user; below is the full output of the
Hi Anirudh,
Is this still an issue for you?
I tried recreating the issue on my own system following your setup steps but I
did not encounter any issue, I was able to ping both the OVS bridge and
external VMs using vhostuser.
If this is still an issue could your provide the OVS logs for you
> Hello all,
>
> I remember some time ago there was topic raised here about new LTS
> release. I'd like to ask related question - what version of DPDK will it
> be based on? 18.11 (which is going to be new LTS release of DPDK)?
>
Yes, the plan would be ideally to move to DPDK 18.11.
> If it
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Alan Kayahan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have 3 OVS bridges on the same host, connected to each other as
> > br1<->br2<->br3. br1 and br3 are connected to the docker container cA
> > via dpdkvhostuser port type (I know it is deprecated, the app works
> >
> On 10/18/2018 10:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > I've had a number of queries from folks lately about our roadmap for
> > LTS releases. It has, indeed, been a long time since we've had a
> > long-term support release (the current LTS is 2.5). Usually, we've
> > done LTS releases before some kind
The documentation provides a guide to configuring supported tunnels in
userspace, I'm not aware of any reason why GRE would not work in the OVS DPDK
deployment.
You can follow this guide below and swap VXLAN for GRE where applicable.
On 8/27/2019 9:35 AM, Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团 wrote:
Hi, all
I’m doing experiments with OVS and OVS DPDK, only one bridge is there,
ports and flows are same for OVS and OVS DPDK, in OVS case, everything works
well, but in OVS DPDK case, iperf udp performance data are very poor, udp
packets
On 11/20/2019 6:02 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
On 19/11/2019 18:48, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 19.11.2019 19:01, Eli Britstein wrote:
On 11/19/2019 7:46 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 19.11.2019 18:29, Eli Britstein wrote:
On 11/19/2019 7:27 PM, Eli Britstein wrote:
Hi
I see this file has many
On 9/16/2019 8:40 AM, Rajesh Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, Didn't complete my previous mail.
Hi Rajesh, apologies for the delay on my part in responding, I've been
out of office the past few weeks.
The errors I was getting are
1)
root@basepdump-67b4b8-lt8wf:/# pdump
EAL: Detected 2
On 9/18/2019 5:22 AM, Anish M wrote:
Hello,
Im trying to forward/mirror VM packets between two ovs-dpdk compute
nodes. With the help of
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/userspace-tunneling/ link, i
could able to setup additional NIC for forwarding the packet from source
Message-
> From: David Marchand
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:04 PM
> To: Ali Shah, Syed Faraz
> Cc: b...@openvswitch.org; Puzikov, DmitriiX ;
> Gibson, Joel A ; Gherghe, Calin
> ; Stokes, Ian
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS (tag: 2.16.2) Build Fails With DPD
ne with community policy.
Thanks
Ian
>
> Anyways, We will wait for 2.17... thanks much to David and You
>
> Kind Regards,
> Syed Faraz Ali Shah,
> System Software Validation Engineer
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stokes, Ian
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20
37 matches
Mail list logo
