On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2017 2:25 PM, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
>
> On 22 June 2017 at 16:08, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jun 23, 2017 1:31 AM, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
> >
> > On 22 June 2017 at 04:16, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On
On Jun 23, 2017 2:25 PM, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
On 22 June 2017 at 16:08, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2017 1:31 AM, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
>
> On 22 June 2017 at 04:16, Numan Siddique wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 June 2017 at 04:1
On 22 June 2017 at 16:08, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2017 1:31 AM, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
>
> On 22 June 2017 at 04:16, Numan Siddique wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tu
On Jun 23, 2017 1:31 AM, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
On 22 June 2017 at 04:16, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 19
On 22 June 2017 at 04:16, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer
On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 15 June 2017 at 22:20, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> >>
> >> On 15 June 2017 at 22:20, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Aswin S
> wr
On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 15 June 2017 at 22:20, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Aswin S wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Adding some more info here, Thanks Numan! for pointi
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 15 June 2017 at 22:20, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Aswin S wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Adding some more info here, Thanks Numan! for pointing to this.
> >>
> >> The issue I am facing looks similar to the
On 15 June 2017 at 22:20, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Aswin S wrote:
>>
>>
>> Adding some more info here, Thanks Numan! for pointing to this.
>>
>> The issue I am facing looks similar to the one described in [1] and [2].
>> But it seems the issue is not yet fixed.
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Aswin S wrote:
>
> Adding some more info here, Thanks Numan! for pointing to this.
>
> The issue I am facing looks similar to the one described in [1] and [2].
> But it seems the issue is not yet fixed. Is there a plan to fix this soon?
> In Opendaylight security
Adding some more info here, Thanks Numan! for pointing to this.
The issue I am facing looks similar to the one described in [1] and [2].
But it seems the issue is not yet fixed. Is there a plan to fix this soon?
In Opendaylight security groups is implemented using ovs-conntrack. So the
flow based
Joe,
Thanks for the quick response, I apologize for being cryptic. Yes FIP is
floating IP and SG is access control list. The issue can be reproduced with
two namespace using the steps in [1] in ovs 2.7.
With [1]
>From 10.100.5.8 if I try to ping/ssh 10.100.5.9 it works, but not when I
try ping/s
On 1 June 2017 at 05:23, Aswin S wrote:
> Hi,
> When SG is implemented using conntrack rules , TCP connection via FIP
> between vms in the same compute is failing
What is SG?
Is FIP "floating IP"?
> In my topology I have two vm on the same compute both having floating ip
> associated with it an
15 matches
Mail list logo