Nice pickup.
Will be included in the next release.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Marcus Priesch wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> i found an endless loop in the Slurp function (ow_slurp.c) ...
>
> reproduceable simply by unplugging the LinkUSB when owfs is using the
> device - also when there is no traff
Yes, directories would be good, but thinking about my original post
more, what I actually want is the ability to emulate a hub to make sure
my code is properly walking the entire tree when it is finding all the
sensors. In a hub, there are several "root" nodes that have one or
more sensors han
Dear all,
i found an endless loop in the Slurp function (ow_slurp.c) ...
reproduceable simply by unplugging the LinkUSB when owfs is using the
device - also when there is no traffic ...
adding these lines at the end solves it for me ...
if (ignore_result == 0) {
Thanks! OWFS has always been a central part of our research, and this
patch helps greatly!
--Jim
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Paul Alfille wrote:
> Thank you for making this easily tested demonstration.
>
> The bug seems to be in large (>64 byte) reads with the USB adapter,
> and is now fixe
Hello,
I see the 2.8p3 release with the bug fix :). Really speed ;)
Thanks,
Fritz
Le 01/11/2010 23:06, Joshua J. Kugler a écrit :
> Yup, it's a bug. Patch is attached.
>
> Paul, could this be applied soon (if it hasn't already)?
>
> j
>
> On Wednesday 27 October 2010, Fritz SMH elucidated thus
Hi!
I'm using owfs 2.7p33 and everyting is perfect.
Problem exists with 2.7p39 and above (including 2.8p3)
OS: Linux Debian etch
I have 2 DS9490R and several 1-wire devices and temperature sensors (all
sensors use parasitic power)
/opt/owfs/bin/owserver -uall -p 3000 --error_level=1
/opt/owfs/
