Am Freitag, 10. Juni 2005 02:10 schrieb jerry scharf:
> > Our ideas only differ in one thing: You want to put additional data about
> > the module into an additional chip on the module, I will put this
> > information onto the host's harddisk/flash.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Jan
>
> Jan,
>
"JK" == Jan Kandziora wrote:
JK> BUGS
JK> Simultaneous work of several connections is not supported.
>>
>>
JK> I really need multiple simultaneous connections for my application -
>> who JK> doesn't? Is this a limitation of owlib (global data structures) or
>> simply a JK> limitation in
On Thursday 09 June 2005 03:18 pm, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> How does owserver reacts if the serial/usb etc. 1-wire adapter is pulled
> and reconnected later? As far as I checked, owserver does not recognize the
> reconnect. How to solve this?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jan
>
OWFS doesn't care that t
--On 06/10/2005 12:10:24 AM +0200 Jan Kandziora wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 23:08 schrieb Scott Walde:
>> Hi. I've been pretty quiet on this list so far, so I feel a bit
>> awkward jumping in right here. Anyways, I have another suggestion for
>> identifying aggregates. You can put a
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 13:28 schrieb Serg Oskin:
>
> JK> Hm. What to try next?
>
> Don't run bootstrap, try
> aclocal && autoheader && autoconf && libtoolize -f -c && automake -a -c &&
> ./configure --enable-tcl
>
Worked! Thanks a lot.
Jan
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 21:03 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.:
> Tested it out:
> If an owserver process fails, The system reports no content on that bus
> entry, until it is restored. Probably exactly what you want.
>
Yes, already found this out, too. Excellent!
> Will you know all the owserve
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 23:08 schrieb Scott Walde:
> >>Hi. I've been pretty quiet on this list so far, so I feel a bit awkward
> >>jumping in right here. Anyways, I have another suggestion for
> >>identifying aggregates. You can put an EPROM device such as the DS2505
> >>into each aggregate
Hi. I've been pretty quiet on this list so far, so I feel a bit awkward
jumping in right here. Anyways, I have another suggestion for
identifying aggregates. You can put an EPROM device such as the DS2505
into each aggregate device and place information on that EPROM
describing the components
Alfille, Paul H.,M.D. wrote:
Absolutely right idea. I thnk the DS2438 is the prefered configuration chip (It
has many functions).
Hmmm. Yes, it's a useful chip, but with only 40 bytes I'm not sure if
it would have enough storage to do what I was thinking. Of course, it
may be plenty for wha
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 16:08 schrieb Scott Walde:
> Jan Kandziora wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 11:39 schrieb Paul Alfille:
> >>You are addressing a more general problem, aggregates of 1-wire devices.
> >>There are a few known sensors, like the pressure sensor, that use more
> >> than
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 14:06 schrieb Serg Oskin:
> "JK" == Jan Kandziora wrote:
>
> JK> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2005 23:12 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.:
> >> You are absolutely welcome to participate.
>
> JK> Then I'm happy to go on the bug-hunt.
>
> JK> Anyway, for my project I need an auto
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 12:47 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.:
> What would you like it to do?
> We have several choices:
> 1. Report (after a timeout) as no devices present on that owserver, and
> keep reporting that until reconnected.
> 2. Have a separate means of testing status and response. A
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 6:47 AM
To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Owfs-developers] First Post and some questions
What would you like it to do?
We have several choices:
1. Report
: Re: [Owfs-developers] First Post and some questions
Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 11:39 schrieb Paul Alfille:
>>You are addressing a more general problem, aggregates of 1-wire devices.
>>There are a few known sensors, like the pressure sensor, that use more th
Jan Kandziora wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 11:39 schrieb Paul Alfille:
You are addressing a more general problem, aggregates of 1-wire devices.
There are a few known sensors, like the pressure sensor, that use more than
one device to make a larger circuit.
I think there are two ways t
"JK" == Jan Kandziora wrote:
JK> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2005 23:12 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.:
>>
>> You are absolutely welcome to participate.
>>
JK> Then I'm happy to go on the bug-hunt.
JK> Anyway, for my project I need an automation framework (not a GUI, just a
JK> library) for 1-w
"JK" == Jan Kandziora wrote:
JK> Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 07:55 schrieb Serg Oskin:
>> "JK" == Jan Kandziora wrote:
>>
JK> * What's up with the Tcl binding? The ow.so file seems to be missing -
>> at JK> least, I could not make sense of the SWIG guided build process -
>> know enough JK>
What would you like it to do?
We have several choices:
1. Report (after a timeout) as no devices present on that owserver, and keep
reporting that until reconnected.
2. Have a separate means of testing status and response. Adding a "present" flag
would have nice homology with the 1-wire device stru
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 11:39 schrieb Paul Alfille:
> >
> > Anyway, for my project I need an automation framework (not a GUI, just a
> > library) for 1-wire devices and Linux, with some things owfs itself
> > doesn't address, e.g. timers or grouping of 1-wire chips to "devices" -
> > the goal h
On Thursday 09 June 2005 04:33 am, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2005 23:12 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.:
> > You are absolutely welcome to participate.
>
> Then I'm happy to go on the bug-hunt.
>
> Anyway, for my project I need an automation framework (not a GUI, just a
> library) f
Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2005 23:12 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.:
>
> You are absolutely welcome to participate.
>
Then I'm happy to go on the bug-hunt.
Anyway, for my project I need an automation framework (not a GUI, just a
library) for 1-wire devices and Linux, with some things owfs itself doesn'
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 07:55 schrieb Serg Oskin:
> "JK" == Jan Kandziora wrote:
>
> JK> * What's up with the Tcl binding? The ow.so file seems to be missing -
> at JK> least, I could not make sense of the SWIG guided build process -
> know enough JK> of SWIG to avoid it, though.
>
> owtcl doe
"JK" == Jan Kandziora wrote:
JK> * What's up with the Tcl binding? The ow.so file seems to be missing - at
JK> least, I could not make sense of the SWIG guided build process - know
enough
JK> of SWIG to avoid it, though.
owtcl does not compiled by default, run configure or bootsrap with
--
Jan,
You are absolutely welcome to participate.
To answer your questions:
1. MIPS works. Christian Magnusson is the wizard at porting.
2. Slaves using owserver is the intended design.
We don't currently implement adding/removing owservers sources while the owfs
(or whatever) process is running,
24 matches
Mail list logo
