Alfille, Paul H.,M.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was wondering if 1-wire may require some strange timing stuff which
>> would suggest an in-kernel implementation rather than userspace.
>>
>> Not when connected to through the serial or USB adapters. A direct IO pin
>> might be a different sto
I was wondering if 1-wire may require some strange timing stuff which would
suggest an in-kernel implementation rather than userspace.
Sven
--
Not when connected to through the serial or USB adapters. A direct IO pin might
be a different story, though that seems very hardware-specific.
Paul
-
jerry scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll go farther than what Peter said. In my opinion, most "let's add it to
> the kernel" ideas are misguided. My initial stand is always that if it
> doesn't need to be in the kernel, it shouldn't be.
Actually this is the Opinion of many Kernel-Hackers
--On 05/24/2005 03:39:59 PM + Sven Geggus wrote:
Hi there,
first of all I have note, that owfs is the best 1-wire Application I have
seen on linux so far.
Having used a patched Version of digitemp for my tcl/tk Application so
far I was now able to suspend the patch and use the Tcl-Interfac
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 12:16 pm, Peter Kropf wrote:
> From my experience, the kernel drivers aren't worth the effort to try
> to get working. Last time I looked at them, they were undocumented and
> there was no user mode code / library / examples that used them. The
> kernel drivers are also not c
>From my experience, the kernel drivers aren't worth the effort to try
to get working. Last time I looked at them, they were undocumented and
there was no user mode code / library / examples that used them. The
kernel drivers are also not compatable with OWFS.
My suggestion is to not load them int
