Do you mean installcheck?
I was unaware of such a problem: both 'make check' and 'make installcheck' do
nothing in src/man, since no test suite is defined.
S.
On 02 Jun 2014, at 23:32, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am 02.06.2014 21:27, schrieb Stefano Miccoli:
>>
>> This target (which I would call
Am 03.06.2014 09:02, schrieb Stefano Miccoli:
> Do you mean installcheck?
>
> I was unaware of such a problem: both 'make check' and 'make
> installcheck' do nothing in src/man, since no test suite is defined.
>
No, the "checkinstall" program which creates RPM and DEB packages just
from a Makefil
No, I do not think: I addressed only problems on Darwin.
BTW I tested my patch under the assumption that manpages are installed in a
tree which is distinct from the system one: I do not know how package
maintainers will address this layout. The idea is to keep upstream as simple as
possible and
Your changes were applied, Stefano.
Jan, I'd be happy to make any changes that ease package maintainer's work.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stefano Miccoli wrote:
> No, I do not think: I addressed only problems on Darwin.
>
> BTW I tested my patch under the assumption that manpages are inst
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:27:05PM +0200, Stefano Miccoli wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> I tried to compile owfs on recent Darwin (OS X Mavericks), hitting against a
> number of problems, the biggest being how semaphores are implemented.
>
> I decided to tackle the problem starting from the simplest (tr
Tomasz, would you use dbus for systemd? And would you send 1-wire data that
way or just program control.
Looking at dbus, it certainly looks like 1-wire data could map to it
easily. I'm just not sure if it would be useful.
Paul
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun
