Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: owfs

2005-09-09 Thread Daniel Hiepler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vom: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 23:38:08 +0200 > Hi rigid, > My point of view is to do from the simplest step by step to the > target. > > 1) you are saying you have got a non-cd-rom system. Why just not to > install some unused CD-ROM (I think it is possible t

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: owfs

2005-09-09 Thread Daniel Hiepler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vom: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 22:38:09 -0400 > Well, the passive adapter has: > > 1. the worst performance > 2. the highest CPU utilization > 3. the most touchy construction (witness all the variants) > 4. the least availability > on the other hand: 1. per

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: owfs

2005-09-09 Thread Paul Alfille
On Friday 09 September 2005 04:03 am, Daniel Hiepler wrote: > i'm pretty sure it's a bug... > if you want you can send me a patch that enables debug-output for > passive-adapters... anything you want btw. it's kinda strange that > the cheapest/least-complex adaptor is the one least tested... :)

Re: [Owfs-developers] OWFS-DSL complete live-cd

2005-09-09 Thread Paul Alfille
On Friday 09 September 2005 01:13 am, Christian Magnusson wrote: > I am running FC4 too at work, and why not add /usr/local/lib to > ld.so.conf just to be sure you don't forget to move the libraries > to /usr/lib when you update fuse next time. I think this is a much > better solution. > > > more /

[Owfs-developers] Fwd: [fuse-devel] FUSE merged to 2.6.14!

2005-09-09 Thread Paul Alfille
Great news. FUSE will be part of the standard kernel, and thus presumably available for OWFS. I'm guessing that the other distributions will join Debian and Gentoo in including it. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [fuse-devel] FUSE merged to 2.6.14! Date: Friday 09 September 2

Re[2]: [Owfs-developers] Re: owfs

2005-09-09 Thread Petr
Hi rigid, My point of view is to do from the simplest step by step to the target. 1) you are saying you have got a non-cd-rom system. Why just not to install some unused CD-ROM (I think it is possible to get it anywhere for free these days). My point of view is this is the simplest step you can do

Re: [Owfs-developers] owfs DS9490R usb adapter w/ uclibc buildroot not working

2005-09-09 Thread Chris Baechle
ok, solved the problem. usb filesystem wasn't mounted and because I didn't hotplugging support, it wasn't automatically mounted. Added the line to mount my usb filesystem and it works now. k thx noob mistake!! On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 09:41 +, Chris Baechle wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 08:29

Re: [Owfs-developers] owfs DS9490R usb adapter w/ uclibc buildroot not working

2005-09-09 Thread Chris Baechle
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 08:29 +0200, Christian Magnusson wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:22 +, Chris Baechle wrote: > > I currently have a DS9490R usb adapter that I can not get owfs or > > owhttpd to recognize. > > > > I have gotten owfs to work with other distributions. However, I can not >

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: owfs

2005-09-09 Thread Daniel Hiepler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi christian... i got some new infos which may ease the debugging process for you... i managed to detect the DS2408 by removing all other devices from the bus. Only then the device shows up. But obviously it is only a problem of detection. I used owh

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: owfs

2005-09-09 Thread Daniel Hiepler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vom: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:47:35 +0200 > Without grounding the VDD you are only lucky if the devices work as > they should. > > There might also be problems with reflections in the cables, and that > is perhaps not a problem for digitemp if it's readin

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: owfs

2005-09-09 Thread Christian Magnusson
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 07:46 +0200, Daniel Hiepler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Vom: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 07:35:32 +0200 > > > > > > > I presume all the data pins are connected together and all the > > > > ground pins (and VDD for DS1820) are connected together. Excep